Hello lilyponders,
in (very?) recent versions of the manuals I've seen notations like
\relative { c' d e f g a b c }
while older editions and e.g. all the templates in frescobaldi use
\relative c' { c d e f g a b c }
Obviously both produce exactly the same result.
Is there something like a "best
Michael Gerdau writes:
> Hello lilyponders,
>
> in (very?) recent versions of the manuals I've seen notations like
> \relative { c' d e f g a b c }
> while older editions and e.g. all the templates in frescobaldi use
> \relative c' { c d e f g a b c }
>
> Obviously both produce exactly the same r
On 01.11.2015 12:59, David Kastrup wrote:
So there's not really a "best practice" but rather one that requires
least choice-making for those not interested in making more choices than
necessary.
It’s also the one with the least superficial elements, in other words:
least to type.
Yours, Simo
> > Is there something like a "best practice" w/r to the use of \relative?
> > Or why does this difference exist ?
[long and extensive explanation skipped]
> So there's not really a "best practice" but rather one that requires
> least choice-making for those not interested in making more choices
