Hi Nick,
> I thing I haven't managed to fix is that the barring indication looks better
> if both the right- and left-hand ends are extended slightly so that they
> don't both start and finish centred on a note, like so:
>
> \barre #0.0 "CIV" #'(-0.5 . -1) #10
>
> But this means that a barre tha
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Payne
Sent: Saturday, 20 September 2008 12:16
To: 'Mailinglist lilypond-user'
Subject: RE: Questions on beaming and barring
Thanks again. One final (I hope) question. When the duration of the barr
Thanks again. One final (I hope) question. When the duration of the barre
causes it to start on one stave and finish on another, that presents two
problems in the output:
1. On the stave where the barre continues, it starts slightly to the left of
the very beginning of the stave rather than abo
Hi Nick,
2008/9/19 Nick Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Neil
>
> Thanks. I used your function definition in a short test and it worked just as
> I wanted. Strangely, however, when I used the function identically in the
> piece I'm engraving, I just get a dashed line where I should see the barring
re indication should be.
Can anyone shed some light on this?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Neil Puttock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2008 06:12
To: Kieren MacMillan
Cc: Nick Payne; Mailinglist lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Questions on beaming and barring
2008/9
ursday, 18 September 2008 06:12
To: Kieren MacMillan
Cc: Nick Payne; Mailinglist lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Questions on beaming and barring
2008/9/17 Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Usually, I would suggest running convert-ly, but that appears not to work on
> this file for
2008/9/17 Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Usually, I would suggest running convert-ly, but that appears not to work on
> this file for some reason (which I'm too busy to figure out right now) —
> instead, I manually updated the following function definition for you:
Some of the changes to
Hi Nick,
I tested the Mutopia source adelita.ly file with Lilypond 2.11.58
The file was written for Lilypond 2.8.0, and many things have changed
since then.
Usually, I would suggest running convert-ly, but that appears not to
work on this file for some reason (which I'm too busy to figur
1. Is it possible to put a slight slope on beams which Lilypond defaults to
engraving as flat? I've found out how to flatten a sloped beam but not the
reverse. Where I've got a whole page of arpeggiated 16th notes, I think it
looks better to have them all slightly sloping than flat.
2. I'm tryi
