Thank you! Both these examples helped!
I ended up using the \beatstructure because I realized I had to do it for
the whole measure.
-Molly
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 2:09 PM James.Correa
wrote:
>
> I think this is what you are looking for:
>
> \version "2.22.2"
>
> \score {
> \absolute {
>
> \tup
I think this is what you are looking for:
\version "2.22.2"
\score {
\absolute {
\tuplet 3/2 { f ''16 [ c'' \once \set stemRightBeamCount = #1 f'' } \once \set
stemLeftBeamCount = #1 c'' f'' ) ] | %m67
}
}
---
James Correa
Composer - guitarist - sound designer
http://www.jamescorrea.net
http:/
Hi Molly,
you can subdivide beams. F. ex.:
\score {
\absolute {
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/8)
\set beatStructure = 2,2,2,2
\tuplet 3/2 { f ''16 c''f'' } c''f''
Am 20.06.2015 um 04:04 schrieb William Zeitler:
I want to do like the attached gif: notice the broken 16th note beams.
Please do not introduce a new topic by answering to an existing thread,
this causes confusion.
(More in the score dictates that this needs to be 6/8. Meanwhile the general
qu
Am 10.07.2013 13:55, schrieb Urs Liska:
Am 10.07.2013 13:52, schrieb Nick Payne:
This works:
\version "2.17.21"
{
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1 16)
a'16[ r r a']
\stopStaff
s2
\startStaff
a'32[ r r a']
}
Thank you.
Of course I thought about sub
Am 10.07.2013 13:52, schrieb Nick Payne:
On 10/07/13 19:03, Urs Liska wrote:
Hi,
I need to achieve a beaming as in the attached png, i.e. beams over
rests with only one beam throughout the time.
a)
Is it really true that I have to do that manually in the way I did it in
the attached file?
Th
On 10/07/13 19:03, Urs Liska wrote:
Hi,
I need to achieve a beaming as in the attached png, i.e. beams over
rests with only one beam throughout the time.
a)
Is it really true that I have to do that manually in the way I did it in
the attached file?
This works:
\version "2.17.21"
{
\set su
ting on beats 2 and 4 which happens by
default.
HTH
Trevor D
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Andrew Black
> Sent: 14 February 2008 13:03
> To: lilypond-user@gnu
Steve Dunlop wrote:
4/4 time. Lilypond 2.11.33.
I'm trying to get the autobeaming behavior to match an existing style
I have read and re-read the autobeaming description and find it too
complex. I want to beam quavers and semiquavers so that they always
stop on a crotchet beat.
Ie a8
Unfortunately, this isn't possible with the current autobeaming mechanism,
which only looks at one note at a time and checks if it's on a beat where
the beam should be started or ended. To do what you want, it would have
to also look at future notes to decide on the beam break.
Of course, if you
Subject: Re: Beaming question
I don't know, if it's a feature or a bug, but at least it should be
possible to
override it, which I couldn't manage to do. The following example
illustrates the same phenomenon. As far as I can see, subdivideBeams should
be set to false by default.
I don't know, if it's a feature or a bug, but at least it should be
possible to
override it, which I couldn't manage to do. The following example
illustrates the same phenomenon. As far as I can see, subdivideBeams
should be set to false by default.
\version "2.8.0"
\relative c'' {
c16 [ b a g
With and 2.8.5 2.9.10 I get exactly the same result, so perhaps it's
not a bug, but a mistake of mine? Is the code correct for the desired
result?
Thanks,
Thomas
> There have recently been some bugs with the beaming in the
> development versions. I really recommend you to use the latest
> stable v
There have recently been some bugs with the beaming in the
development versions. I really recommend you to use the latest
stable version 2.8.x for any serious typesetting. Also, if you use
the development version, please report bugs at bug-lilypond@gnu.org
(but first check the archives to avoid du
14 matches
Mail list logo
