ypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: LSR Execution? Failure
Please, this is a very tedious method for your and everybody else to help
you debug .ly files for version 2.8, just because you only have version 2.4
on your own machine.
I know you want to keep your installation of 2.4, but isn't there
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 07:34 -0500, Fairchild wrote:
> Is there a way to post ly and pdf files to LSR, bypassing execution by LSR?
Well, no and I don't think it would be the right place. Moreover, scheme
lilypond code tends to be highly version-dependent and cause major
headaches when LSR must be r
.
- Bruce
-Original Message-
From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 7:10 AM
To: Fairchild
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: LSR Execution? Failure
Please, this is a very tedious method for your and everybody else to help
you debug .ly files for
Is there a way to post ly and pdf files to LSR, bypassing execution by LSR?
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 7:21 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Cc: Fairchild
Subject: Re: LSR Execution? Failure
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Ple
list for
inclusion in the docs elicited no response.
- Bruce
-Original Message-
From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 7:10 AM
To: Fairchild
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: LSR Execution? Failure
Please, this is a very
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Please, this is a very tedious method for your and everybody else to
help you debug .ly files for version 2.8, just because you only have
version 2.4 on your own machine.
In addition, some scheme commands are disabled on LSR due to security
concerns (see --safe in the man
Please, this is a very tedious method for your and everybody else to
help you debug .ly files for version 2.8, just because you only have
version 2.4 on your own machine.
I know you want to keep your installation of 2.4, but isn't there any
way for you to get access also to a recent version?
If