On Wed Jun 30, 2004 at 03:06:16PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I hope you have noticed the skipTypesetting property. See
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Skipping-corrected-music.html
sure, I have used it but for some reason I found the use of variables
for sect
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pedro Kroger wrote:
>
>> I forgot to mention that if you typeset long scores, it may be a good
>> idea to use variables. I use variables for each section, like
>> \sectiona \sectionb, etc. Them I can comment out the sections I don't
>> want to compile r
I hope you have noticed the skipTypesetting property. See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Skipping-corrected-music.html
/Mats
Pedro Kroger wrote:
I forgot to mention that if you typeset long scores, it may be a good
idea to use variables. I use variables for each
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Ralph Little writes:
>
> > With a lot of files related to notes files etc, I have started using
> > Makefiles to automate the build process, being a die-hard UNIX
> > programmer ;)
I did something like this. My motivation was that I didn't want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 28 June 2004 13:06, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> If there's interest in using makefiles after all, it may be a good
> idea to revive this idea, fix the makefile, documentation and add
> lilypond-book rules etc.
That would go down pretty well w
Ralph Little writes:
> Erm, I'm not really sure what you mean.
Hmm, I'm not having my most communicative day, it seems. Some odd
years ago, I made a small effort to provide a shared make file for
lilypond, esp. for making contributions to mutopia easier.
I'm fairly sure that this was documented
11:22
To: Ralph Little
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Methods of working
Ralph Little writes:
> With a lot of files related to notes files etc, I have started using
> Makefiles to automate the build process, being a die-hard UNIX
> programmer ;)
Any big reason no
ules and the like.
As I say, does anybody else do this kind of thing?
Regards,
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 28/06/2004 11:22
To: Ralph Little
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Methods of working
Ralph Little write
Ralph Little writes:
> With a lot of files related to notes files etc, I have started using
> Makefiles to automate the build process, being a die-hard UNIX
> programmer ;)
Any big reason not to use/extend/send bug reports on the for this
purpose included .../lilypond-xyz/share/make/ly.make Makef
Hi,
With a lot of files related to notes files etc, I have started using Makefiles to
automate the build process, being a die-hard UNIX programmer ;)
If you are interested what I have, let me know and will post something.
It is not sophisticated, but means I don't have to worry about what is up-t
Thanks, all is working now. Appreciate the help.
Regards,
Chip
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
Please use jEdit 4.1 -> 4.2 is not stable jet, so it is not supported, and
because of the many changes in the plugin interface, we can't support to
jEdit at one time.
Sorry,
Bert
Cannot start: java.lang.Incompat
Please use jEdit 4.1 -> 4.2 is not stable jet, so it is not supported, and
because of the many changes in the plugin interface, we can't support to
jEdit at one time.
Sorry,
Bert
> Cannot start: java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError:
> Implementing class
> Try updating to a newer version of t
Thanks for the tip. Still have an error coming up -
/usr/home/chip/.jedit/jars/LilyPondTool.jar:
Cannot start: java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Implementing class
Try updating to a newer version of the plugin
Which plugin does it want me to update? I got the latest from the sites
of all the
Sure, you must download and unzip the LilyJHelp package found on the project
website to the jars directory of jEdit. (www.sf.net/projects/lily4jedit)
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
The completion is not automatic, you should add a shortcut for
Plugins/SideKick/Show Completion Popup (Utitilities/Global
options/jEdit->Shortcuts)
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-u
--- Forwarded message follows ---
From: Thomas Scharkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bertalan Fodor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Methods of working
Date sent: Sun, 27 Jun
> - If I want to override something I hardly know what property to set,
> I type \override and using the autocompletion and the popup
> property-help I choose the appropriate property.
This does not work for me.
Perhaps I am missing something (again)? I get no popup at all.
Thomas
cygwin on xp
I've decided to try jedit with the lilypond plugin, so I installed jedit
and the plugin, and the dozen or so plugins the lilypond plugin
requires, but am stuck on one more plugin it need - jhall.jar. I cannot
find this plugin anywhere, do you have it or know where I can find it?
Regards,
chip
B
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> A not-too-complicated 4-voice TTBB piece with lyrics usually enters at
>> about 2 hours a page for me, at the moment.
>
> The numbers that I hear surpise me much. For (admittedly: simple)
> polyphonic pieces (eg. mozart,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A not-too-complicated 4-voice TTBB piece with lyrics usually enters at
> about 2 hours a page for me, at the moment.
The numbers that I hear surpise me much. For (admittedly: simple)
polyphonic pieces (eg. mozart, gabrieli), I do about 4 to 5 pages per
hour; Usually, I
Arvid Grøtting writes:
>> It seems that not much people use Xdvi and point-and-click, not even
>> emacs users?
>
> Xdvi and what, exactly? Now you really got me curious.
In that case, go to lilypond.org and type point-and-click in the
search box.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems that not much people use Xdvi and point-and-click, not even
> emacs users?
Xdvi and what, exactly? Now you really got me curious.
Me, I use GNU Emacs (under X11 on OSX) and xdvi. I use lilypond-mode
in Emacs, and I compile the files from
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Alex Young writes:
but has anyone tried Arch? I'm tempted to give it a go.
Testimonials? Acrimonials?
Then just try it, it works. You'll need to read the manual.
I'm sure it does, and I'm sure I will... I'm just not quite irritated
enough with CVS yet to take the plung
Alex Young writes:
> but has anyone tried Arch? I'm tempted to give it a go.
> Testimonials? Acrimonials?
Then just try it, it works. You'll need to read the manual.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 24 June 2004 14:20, Pedro Kroger wrote:
> > I do like the CVS interface--I've been wondering how to version my work
> > efficiently.
>
> Version control is another thing I don't live without. I used to use
> CVS but now I'm switching to sub
> Jan> It seems that not much people use Xdvi and
> point-and-click, not even
> Jan> emacs users?
>
> I've tried it. I think I stopped because there were problems with
> Xdvi, although I don't remember the details. The gv with refresh is
> the display I'm most comfortable with.
Perhaps
Hi.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:59:48PM +1000, Cameron and Trudy Horsburgh wrote:
> I've been wondering lately how other people organise their workflow, the
> tools used, and how they actually go through the typesetting process.
> Given the number of different platforms supported, I imagine this
> "Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> It seems that not much people use Xdvi and point-and-click, not even
Jan> emacs users?
I've tried it. I think I stopped because there were problems with
Xdvi, although I don't remember the details. The gv with refresh is
* Nick Busigin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what is "ion" ?
Ion is a X window manager modeled (sort of) after screen. Here is
it's webpage:
http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/
Pedro
___
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Busigin writes:
> P.S. I use emacs in one window, run lilypond in a bash shell in the
> next window and gv with refresh mode set in a third.
It seems that not much people use Xdvi and point-and-click, not even
emacs users?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyP
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Alex Young wrote:
> It has struck me more than once that a windowed desktop environment
> isn't necessarily the best for lilypond work. I'm trying out an ion
> setup that has a nice, big preview pane on the left for the ps/pdf
> output, and small panes for the editor and cons
I use jEdit (www.jedit.org) with the LilyPond plugin
(www.sf.net/projects/lily4jedit). That's all. The best that I don't have to
leave jEdit and can do anything :-) If I were you I compared it to an
Emacs-based workflow :-)
- I click on the "document wizard" button and set up my staves with lyrics
I forgot to mention that if you typeset long scores, it may be a good
idea to use variables. I use variables for each section, like
\sectiona \sectionb, etc. Them I can comment out the sections I don't
want to compile right now. I also use variables for each instrument,
so I can compile only specif
* Alex Young ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> necessarily the best for lilypond work. I'm trying out an ion setup
> that has a nice, big preview pane on the left for the ps/pdf output,
> and small panes for the editor and console on the right. It looks
> and feels pretty smart, but I'm still learnin
* Cameron and Trudy Horsburgh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've been wondering lately how other people organise their workflow, the
> tools used, and how they actually go through the typesetting process.
> Given the number of different platforms supported, I imagine this would
> vary widely.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 24 June 2004 11:59, Cameron and Trudy Horsburgh wrote:
> I use GNU/Linux, normally with a KDE desktop. I use the kwrite editor.
> This doesn't have a lilyPond highlighting mode, but for a lot of my work
> the LaTex mode seems helpful. I'll
36 matches
Mail list logo
