Re: convert-ly log file

2011-06-23 Thread -Eluze
gt; Graham Percival [gra...@percival-music.ca] >> Sent: 23 June 2011 23:35 >> To: K. Kellogg-Smith >> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org >> Subject: Re: convert-ly log file >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:20:07PM -0400, K. Kellogg-Smith wrote: >> >>>

Re: convert-ly log file

2011-06-23 Thread K. Kellogg-Smith
. Kellogg-Smith Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: convert-ly log file On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:20:07PM -0400, K. Kellogg-Smith wrote: convert-ly -e >logfile.txt). DOS creates the log file okay, but the file is empty after the conversion is made. You've redirecte

RE: convert-ly log file

2011-06-23 Thread James Lowe
Subject: Re: convert-ly log file On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:20:07PM -0400, K. Kellogg-Smith wrote: >convert-ly -e >logfile.txt). DOS creates the log file okay, >but the file is empty after the conversion is made. You've redirected stdout, but the convert-ly messages are pro

Re: convert-ly log file

2011-06-23 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:20:07PM -0400, K. Kellogg-Smith wrote: >convert-ly -e >logfile.txt). DOS creates the log file okay, >but the file is empty after the conversion is made. You've redirected stdout, but the convert-ly messages are probably going to stderr. In a typical unix shell