Graham Percival wrote 07 November 2007 16:29
Ok, I was convinced that some reorg was better.
Educational - Editorial annotations
Note heads - 1.1 Pitches
1.3.3 Analysis brackets - Editorial
Take a look at it and let me know what you think.
Docs in the usual GDP
place.
Much, much
Ok, I was convinced that some reorg was better.
Educational - Editorial annotations
Note heads - 1.1 Pitches
1.3.3 Analysis brackets - Editorial
Take a look at it and let me know what you think. Docs in the usual GDP
place.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
Graham Percival wrote:
Ooo, I really like Editorial notation. Anybody object?
Is it Editorial notation or rather Editorial annotations (or maybe
these two
alternatives have so similar meaning that it doesn't matter)?
To me editorial notation gives the impression that it's something
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
To me editorial notation gives the impression that it's something
different
from normal music typesetting notation,
You have a point here.
Basically, we just want to say stuff that makes music easier to read.
I can't think of any short, formal-language phrase that
Graham Percival wrote 06 November 2007 08:54
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
To me editorial notation gives the impression
that it's something
different
from normal music typesetting notation,
You have a point here.
Basically, we just want to say stuff that makes
music easier to
Hope this is not too late to be of use.
Graham Percival wrote on 03 November 2007 06:55
I've decided to do the rest of the first drafts right now.
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
Here's the TODO list.
Educational notation
Was Educational use; name change?
Quite a lot in this section is
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Hope this is not too late to be of use.
No, not at all.
Educational notation
Was Educational use; name change?
No particular good reason. That said, I'm quite open to a real name change.
Quite a lot in this section is not really
educational notation or use.
Graham Percival wrote:
Was Educational use; name change?
No particular good reason. That said, I'm quite open to a real name
change.
It seems to me that much of what's in this section could be classed as
editorial rather than simply educational. So what about Editorial
Notation or
Brett Duncan wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Was Educational use; name change?
No particular good reason. That said, I'm quite open to a real name
change.
It seems to me that much of what's in this section could be classed as
editorial rather than simply educational. So what about
