We will see where this leads.
"Set course to intercept, Number One"
Nils, out.
http://www.denemo.org
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:49:57 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> This is smart pr
>
>
> http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmusescore.org%2Fen%2Fabout%2Ftestimonials&h=cd3b2
>
>
i just tried it and it took me forever to enter 5 notes and add text about the
notes.
However, looking at the lilypond file generated from MuseScore, this reminded
me how big the size of the lilypond file is compared to the number of notes.
%=
% creat
A friend sent me a link about it recently and I looked over the 1st few
tutorials, but did not go any further. It seemed to be a decent concept from
the little I saw.
Does anyone have an opinion if it's a good manuscript program? Not that I am
interested in stopping my use of Lilypond..
From: "Marc Mouries"
I like however the page that allows to sync scores with youtube videos.
Check it out it's really nice. http://musescore.com/node/855
-- Marc
Any idea how they do that ?
Phil.
___
it's explained here: http://screenr.com/3L0
On Dec 10, 2010, at 3:32 AM, Phil Burfitt wrote:
>> From: "Marc Mouries"
>>
>> I like however the page that allows to sync scores with youtube videos.
>> Check it out it's really nice. http://musescore.com/node/855
>>
>>
>> -- Marc
>>
>
> Any idea
Christopher Meredith schreef op do 09-12-2010 om 14:36 [-0600]:
Hi Christopher,
> I'm not sure that's the link you intended to include. It just goes to
> the MuseScore website.
Yes, I was a bit quick with this message. What I meant was the
"share yours" aspect of it -- although I imagined that
I have around 2800 FB friends, nearly all of them musicians, and I plan to
do some Lilypond advocacy - hence my friend request. I'll need some 'backup'
debaters/advisors etc. and so if anybody would like to send me a friend
request, well the more the merrier. I think we can get quite a few convert
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> This is smart pr
>
>
> http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmusescore.org%2Fen%2Fabout%2Ftestimonials&h=cd3b2
>
> also note they have 1500 fans on #fb today!
>
> Greetings, Jan
>
I'm not sure that's the link you intended to inclu
Mike Blackstock schreef op do 09-12-2010 om 17:06 [-0800]:
Hi Mike,
> I have around 2800 FB friends, nearly all of them musicians, and I
> plan to do some Lilypond advocacy - hence my friend request. I'll need
> some 'backup' debaters/advisors etc. and so if anybody would like to
> send me a fri
, so if you are interested,
let
me know.
Paul Thompson
From: Mike Blackstock
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: lilypond-user ; lilypond-devel
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 7:06:33 PM
Subject: Re: musescore
I have around 2800 FB friends, nearly all of them musicians
Il giorno ven, 10/12/2010 alle 09.21 +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen ha
scritto:
> Great stuff also being done by
> http://scorio.org (and even http://etudeapp.com ).
Scorio seems great.
Even though LilyPond is not properly credited, IMO.
I had to use the search bar to find it:
http://www.scorio.com/w
> "Ed" == Ed Ardzinski writes:
Ed> Does anyone have an opinion if it's a good manuscript program?
Ed> Not that I am interested in stopping my use of Lilypond...
I've been using it to import capella files (from the web -- it's the
Holborne dances on the Werner Icking site) and export
On 6/30/2022 11:50 AM, Kira Garvie wrote:
I am having issues exporting an xml file and having it keep its formatting.
Can you further describe the workflow, source and destination of the export?
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
Hello Kira,
I’ve looked at the two files you posted, and the MusicXML export is actually
not reflecting the exact layout of the original.Converting it to LilyPond with
xml2ly gives the same layout as when the exported file is re-imported in
Musecore.
This is a difficult issue at any rate, to b
Thank you, Jacques! That does help.
I work with this system, that creates both printable online files and
downloadable xml files, but lately I have been having formatting issues...
I wish we used something other than MuseScore! (Lilypond is used for a
different part of the project!)
https://my.hymn
On 29 mai 2012, at 09:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> Just to make sure you have seen
>
>
> http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
>
> Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> On 29 mai 2012, at 09:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
>>
>> Just to make sure you have seen
>>
>>
>> http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
>>
>> Wouldn't LilyPond
On Tue, 29 May 2012 11:15:08 +0200
David Kastrup wrote:
> A "SponsorshipMeister" is dangerously close to the premise that we can
> turn money into LilyPond. The truth is that we can turn enthusiasm into
> LilyPond.
Money does prevent enthusiasm from working at a gas station.
Nil
David Kastrup writes:
>> We're missing consensus. I think that if there were a
>> SponsorshipMeister, not unlike the BugMeister, we could do really cool
>> stuff like this. Besides the monetary aid, this brings huge
>> recognition to the community and gets a lot of people on board.
> A "Sponsor
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>>> We're missing consensus. I think that if there were a
>>> SponsorshipMeister, not unlike the BugMeister, we could do really cool
>>> stuff like this. Besides the monetary aid, this brings huge
>>> recognition to the community and gets a lo
2012/5/29 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
>
> Just to make sure you have seen
>
>
> http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
>
> Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
> sponsoring projec
Federico Bruni writes:
> 2012/5/29 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
>>
>> Just to make sure you have seen
>>
>>
>> http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
>>
>> Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior ch
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> 2012/5/29 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
>>
>> Just to make sure you have seen
>>
>>
>> http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
>>
>> Wouldn't LilyPond hav
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
>
> Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
> sponsoring project? What
2012/5/29 Janek Warchoł :
>> What do you mean with "technically superior"? It's about the output?
>> I think it's LilyPond output. Can you confirm?
>> http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/node/191
>
> This isn't Lily output, it's directly from MuseScore.
> You were fooled by the fact that MuseScor
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> Just to make sure you have seen
>
>
> http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
>
> Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice
Excerpts from Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of Tue May 29 09:56:14 +0200 2012:
> Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
> sponsoring project? What are we missing?
Just talking about my personal experience ..
I personally can only say that I've tried teaching lilypond to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 10:15:31 +0200
Marc Weber wrote:
> Musecore fails to render some specific cases when printing - but
> exporting to lilypond seems to work in all (little) cases I tried.
>
> Thus for simple cases I like that combination: musescore for typing and
> lilypond for rendering.
AFAI
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Nils wrote:
> AFAIK musescore dropped Lilypond export support because of a lack of interest
> and in favour of musicXML (whatever that means, I read it somewhere on the
> musescore twitter account or something like this).
> It may still work, but we can expect it
On 29-5-2012 23:16, Nils wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 10:15:31 +0200
Marc Weber wrote:
Musecore fails to render some specific cases when printing - but
exporting to lilypond seems to work in all (little) cases I tried.
Thus for simple cases I like that combination: musescore for typing and
lily
On 29/05/12 20:44, David Kastrup wrote:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
How to turn enthousiasm into LilyPond, if people are unaware of it's
existence. Long before we go SponsorshipMeister, I would suggest a
PRMeister.
I don't think that people are unaware of its existence. Mutopia has
more than
Lucas Gonze writes:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Nils wrote:
>> AFAIK musescore dropped Lilypond export support because of a lack of
>> interest and in favour of musicXML (whatever that means, I read it
>> somewhere on the musescore twitter account or something like this).
>> It may still
On 12-05-29 10:36 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
MuseScore is not a GUI for LilyPond, like LilyPond is not a frontend for
PostScript. If it were a GUI for LilyPond, you could send a LilyPond
file to a MuseScore guy, and he would make some amendments with
MuseScore and send you back the changed LilyPo
>
>
> There is a chance, but only when the syntax is *obvious* enough.
> Currently used syntax isn't obvious enough, but it won't be difficult
> to change it, i think.
>
> for me, as a beginner, notes syntax wasn't the difficult part (then again,
i'm used to write programming code), but page layout
Totally agree Wasil. A beautiful sheet, the syntax is only very small part.
Lilypond make other default setting great. We just focus on music and
syntax. These are the key of music.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Wasil Sergejczyk wrote:
>
>> There is a chance, but only when the syntax is *obvio
On 29 mai 2012, at 23:56, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Nils wrote:
>> AFAIK musescore dropped Lilypond export support because of a lack of
>> interest and in favour of musicXML (whatever that means, I read it somewhere
>> on the musescore twitter account or something li
Jan Nieuwenhuizen gnu.org> writes:
> Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
> sponsoring project? What are we missing?
Somebody who was willing to run a Kickstarter project and make it happen.
The people who put the project together choose their tools, mostly from
Carl Sorensen writes:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen gnu.org> writes:
>
>
>> Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
>> sponsoring project? What are we missing?
>
> Somebody who was willing to run a Kickstarter project and make it
> happen.
It is not just that. There are als
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:16 AM, wrote:
> I know I'm rehashing old ground, but I think that these projects stand to
> mutually benefit from each other if and only if they evolve in "natural"
> directions given their goals. ... In general, the idea of LilyPond is to
> build a master engraver
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore]:
>
> a) MusicXML export means the results are usable in a variety of notation
> programs making use of an open standard.
Indeed, having MusicXML exprort can give Lily more popularity.
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:31:49 +0200
> From: David Kastrup
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: musescore lands sponsoring?
> Message-ID: <87fwahu1lm@fencepost.gnu.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
&g
We'll think about this (and some more, when I'm back and we're ready with our
current job ...). OK, Janek?
Best
Urs
"Janek Warchoł" schrieb:
>On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore]:
>>
>> a) MusicXML export means the resu
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> We'll think about this (and some more, when I'm back and we're ready with our
> current job ...). OK, Janek?
ok
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
Hi Ben.
It's stand-alone (like Sibelius/Finale).
I used it before I knew better, I mean, knew about Lilypond.
Graeme
On 4-Feb 13:08, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore before
and I've looked into it quickly tonight. I'm c
Graeme Lee wrote
> Hi Ben.
>
> It's stand-alone (like Sibelius/Finale).
>
> I used it before I knew better, I mean, knew about Lilypond.
>
> Graeme
>
>
> On 4-Feb 13:08, SoundsFromSound wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore
>> before
Hi Graeme,
Oh ok thanks! I couldn't quite tell for sure because at a /quick /glance
MuseScore output looks a little like Lilypond, but then again once you
/really /look, not really at all. My eyes were clearly playing tricks on me
I guess.
Ben
Musescore uses the feta font (slightly modified)
Graeme Lee wrote
>> Hi Graeme,
>>
>> Oh ok thanks! I couldn't quite tell for sure because at a /quick /glance
>> MuseScore output looks a little like Lilypond, but then again once you
>> /really /look, not really at all. My eyes were clearly playing tricks on
>> me
>> I guess.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>
> Mus
Il 04/feb/2014 03:09 "SoundsFromSound" ha
scritto:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore before
> and I've looked into it quickly tonight. I'm confused about one aspect of
it
> - does it actually /use /LilyPond for it's engraving? Or is it a
comp
Federico Bruni writes:
> Some weeks ago it's been reported here a tweet saying that MuseScore
> developers will drop the lilypond export and focus on musicxml export.
Yes, I had a chat about that with Thomas Bonte. LilyPond export was
in dire need of some love and the best thing to do with code
49 matches
Mail list logo
