hello,
On 1 Apr 2011, at 00:03, "Bernhard Ott" wrote:
> On 30.03.2011 17:36, James Lowe wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> )-Original Message-
>> )From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
>> )[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
>> )Behalf Of Bernha
On 30.03.2011 17:36, James Lowe wrote:
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Bernhard Ott
)Sent: 30 March 2011 15:50
)To: LilyPond-User list
)Subject: numbered
Sorry for my ignorance.
Maybe you could do something with currentBarNumber and adding some offset. But
yes, that will involve some scheme.
laurens.
On 31 mrt 2011, at 01:01, Bernhard Ott wrote:
> On 30.03.2011 17:31, Laurens van der Wee wrote:
>> \compressFullBarRests
> cheers,
>> laurens.
>>
On 30.03.2011 17:31, Laurens van der Wee wrote:
\compressFullBarRests
cheers,
laurens.
On 30 mrt 2011, at 17:50, Bernhard Ott wrote:
Hi again,
I wonder if there is an automated way to produce numbered full-measure rests
like shown in the attachment?
R1^\markup "1" does not come in too hand
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Bernhard Ott
)Sent: 30 March 2011 15:50
)To: LilyPond-User list
)Subject: numbered rests in parts
)
)Hi again,
)I wonder if
