On 27 Sep 2016 18:31, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" wrote:.
>
> > A Lilypond build tool for all platforms to which someone's added half
> > a dozen extra unrelated targets (possibly very large ones such as
> > OpenOffice) = a terrible idea.
>
> Thanks! GUB was the first to be so generic that it could be us
Chris Yate writes:
> At a brief look over GUB, the really big question in my mind is why on
> earth it seems to want to build *everything*.
That's mostly fault.
> A Lilypond build tool for all platforms = a great idea.
Thanks. I developed GUB together with Han-Wen and it was our 4th
iteration
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Shann"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "David Kastrup" ; "Lilypond-User Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 08:53 +0100, P
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Richard Shann" ; "Lilypond-User Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
"Phil Holmes" writes:
-
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Richard Shann"
> To: "David Kastrup"
> Cc: "Lilypond-User Mailing List"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
>>
>
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 08:53 +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Richard Shann"
> To: "David Kastrup"
> Cc: "Lilypond-User Mailing List"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Question: Cross com
On 27 Sep 2016 03:59, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
> > At a brief look over GUB, the really big question in my mind is why on
> > earth it seems to want to build *everything*.
>
> It wants to be _able_ to build everything, like autoconf.
Fine. But Autoconf doesn't ship with makefiles for everything.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Shann"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc: "Lilypond-User Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
and, more specifically, I would guess they are spent in creating the
d
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 04:23 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Chris Yate writes:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online
> >> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly
> >>
Chris Yate writes:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online
>> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly
>> even just to its information/documentation, maybe it _can_ do it
>> alre
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 23:05 Chris Yate wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>
>> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online
>> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly
>> even just to its information/documentation,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
>
> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online
> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad. Yes. Fixes to GUB (possibly
> even just to its information/documentation, maybe it _can_ do it
> already) are of course welcome:
On 26 Sep 2016 20:16, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>
> TBH, you'd probably find it far easier to install a Linux VM on your
Windows host, and compile the problematic score on that. I've done both,
and what I suggest here is what I would do.
That's exactly what I've done - I do a lot of my day job with V
hil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Chris Yate
To: David Kastrup
Cc: Phil Holmes ; Lilypond-User Mailing List
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
Chris Yate writes:
Chris Yate writes:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Chris Yate writes:
>>
>> > Hi Phil,
>> >
>> > Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but
>> that
>> > it seemed such a ludicrous state of affairs that _somebody_ must have a
>> > better soluti
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup wrote:
> Chris Yate writes:
>
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but
> that
> > it seemed such a ludicrous state of affairs that _somebody_ must have a
> > better solution.
>
> If you can find _any_ fr
Chris Yate writes:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but that
> it seemed such a ludicrous state of affairs that _somebody_ must have a
> better solution.
If you can find _any_ free software project requiring a number of free
software compile- and r
Hi Phil,
Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but that
it seemed such a ludicrous state of affairs that _somebody_ must have a
better solution.
I've just installed mingw on Ubuntu, which might possibly do the job...
At the moment my scores have a habit of crashing at
Gub uses http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git as its source. I know
of no way of changing that without a lot of effort changing its codebase. I
personally know of no simple way of cross-compiling LilyPond for Windows
without using Gub as the tool. However, you can (in principle) crea
19 matches
Mail list logo
