Re: \tie and polifonie

Hi, 2011/5/4 Mario Moles > > In this file the function \tie don't work: > > \version "2.13.61" > > \paper { c#(set-paper-size "a4" ) } > > global = { \key c \major \time 4/4 } > > classicalGuitar = \relative c' { > > \global > > % Qui segue la musica. > > <<{b2\rest g'8 a c4~}\\{s2 8[ ] ~}>>| Th

Re: \tie and polifonie

Am 04.05.2011 10:57, schrieb Mario Moles: In this file the function \tie don't work: Why don't you use separate voices for the upper and the lower part? It is easier to write, because you don't have to take the pich of the upper voice into account when writing the lower parts, and the ties wo

Re: Tie collision with note

Op zondag 20 maart 2011 schreef Nicholas: > Ideally, its shape and position > should match the tie in the upper voice, only shifted down. How can I > achieve this? Adding \once \override Tie #'staff-position = #4 just before the tied note yields nice results. \version "2.13.54" \relative c'

Re: Tie collision with note

Indeed, a much cleaner and more elegant approach. Regards, Stan On Mar 20, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Nicholas Moe wrote: Thanks, Stan, for all your help on this. I checked out LilyPondTool and JEdit and was able to see how to get control points from the slur tweak tool. But as I was trying to figure ou

Re: Tie collision with note

Thanks, Stan, for all your help on this. I checked out LilyPondTool and JEdit and was able to see how to get control points from the slur tweak tool. But as I was trying to figure out how to use the slur tweak tool, I came across another tweak that works even better. I adapted \shapeSlur from the L

Re: Tie collision with note

On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:21 AM, Nicholas Moe wrote: That makes the tie how I want it, but I need to shift the middle notes to the right in the second measure to show that they are their own voice, whilst keeping the stems up. How could I do that? Nick I understand. How about this (thanks, JEdi

Re: Tie collision with note

That makes the tie how I want it, but I need to shift the middle notes to the right in the second measure to show that they are their own voice, whilst keeping the stems up. How could I do that? Nick On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Nichola

Re: Tie collision with note

On Mar 19, 2011, at 9:30 PM, Nicholas Moe wrote: I am working on engraving an organ piece, César Franck's Cantabile. In the LH in mm. 16–17, the middle voice is tied, but the tie collides with the notes in the upper voice. Ideally, its shape and position should match the tie in the upper voice,

Re: Tie between repeat and alternative

remove e4 ~ and use \repeatTie in alternative after the note. \repeat volta 2 { r4 e4 } \alternative { e4 \repeatTie f4 } { e4 \repeatTie g4 } --- On Fri, 3/19/10, Alberto Simões wrote: > From: Alberto Simões > Subject: Tie between repeat and alternative > To: "lilypond" > Date: Friday, Ma

Re: Tie between repeat and alternative

Op vrijdag 19 maart 2010 schreef Alberto: > Hello > > When the last note from a repeat includes a tie, the first note from the > alternative gets rendered correctly. But the second alternative don't. > Any way to make it work? \repeat volta 2 { r4 e4 ~ } \alternative { { e4 f4 } { e4\repe

Re: tie engraver in staff? (Re: Tie doesn't tie)

Please note that this problem (and the "solution" of moving the tie engraver to the staff context) has been discussed several times before on the mailing list, including the following threads: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-01/msg00359.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html

Re: tie engraver in staff? (Re: Tie doesn't tie)

Wilbert Berendsen writes: > Agreed. Even when explicitly instantiating voices it remains necessary to use > them for e.g. cross-voice ties. Easy cross-voice ties would be very nice, as > they occor very often in keyboard music. This is an example that works: > > \layout { > \context { > \

tie engraver in staff? (Re: Tie doesn't tie)

Op zondag 08 november 2009 schreef David: > Hm. Maybe ties should work at the staff level as fall-back. Or even > just explicitly. Wouldn't it be nice to be able to say ~~ and have the > tie work staff-level? The current voice jigglery-pokery is not > particularly nice, and it gets worse when

Re: Tie doesn't tie

Hi David, Wouldn't it be nice to be able to say ~~ and have the tie work staff-level? Yes. it gets worse when working with <<\\>> when you have to start guessing the right \voiceOne and similar settings in order to have the invisible notes sit on the same place as the visible ones. I neve

Re: Tie doesn't tie

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi Erik, > >> Why doesn't the first bar tie to the second? > > Because there are three different Voice contexts involved here... be > sure to read the documentation, especially > voices#Multiple-voices>

Re: Tie doesn't tie

Hi Erik, Why doesn't the first bar tie to the second? Because there are three different Voice contexts involved here... be sure to read the documentation, especially But you don't even need that much e

Re: tie direction problems

Ah, I misunderstood. Yes, you want \tieDown. If you'd rather, you can redefine \voiceOne so that ties are always down, but in multi-voice music, the ties follow the direction of the stems. Incidentally, setting \tieDown does not affect the stems. So no, this is not a bug, this is a feature.

Re: tie direction problems

Hi Nick, On 2009-10-02, Nick Didkovsky wrote: > > I was using 2.11.37 when I reported this problem > I upgraded to 2.12.2 but the problem remains, unfortunately > I am reluctant to use tieUp tieDown because then I will need to > specify stem direction as well. These are things LilyPond has been

Re: tie direction problems

That's odd. I assume I get what you want with my install of 2.12.2On 02.10.2009, at 06:11, Nick Didkovsky wrote:Thanks JamesI was using 2.11.37 when I reported this problemI upgraded to  2.12.2 but the problem remains, unfortunatelyI am reluctant to use tieUp tieDown because then I will need to sp

Re: tie direction problems

Thanks James I was using 2.11.37 when I reported this problem I upgraded to 2.12.2 but the problem remains, unfortunately I am reluctant to use tieUp tieDown because then I will need to specify stem direction as well. These are things LilyPond has been doing fine without my specifying and I'd

Re: tie direction problems

On 29.09.2009, at 15:03, Nick Didkovsky wrote: Hello Here's one measure of music with two voices on the same staff. Top voice has some notes that are tied. Bottom voice is an invisible rest. The stems on the notes are all going up. This is good. The ties are upside down however (frowns inst

Re: tie in metronome mark

Hello, 2009/8/28 Nikolay Kirov > Hello all! > > I'd like to produce tie in metronome mark: > > \tempo 8 \tie 8. = 80 (does not work) > > \tempo 8~8. = 80 (does not work) > > e8^\markup { \smaller \note #"8" #1 ~ \smaller \note #"8." #1 = 80 } > (does not work) > > Any suggestions? > > followi

Re: tie over time signature

--- On Sun, 8/2/09, Mark Polesky wrote: > From: Mark Polesky > Subject: Re: tie over time signature > To: "James E. Bailey" , "Jonathan Wilkes" > > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Date: Sunday, August 2, 2009, 6:11 AM > > James E. Bailey wrot

Re: tie over time signature

--- On Sun, 8/2/09, James E. Bailey wrote: > From: James E. Bailey > Subject: Re: tie over time signature > To: "Jonathan Wilkes" > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Date: Sunday, August 2, 2009, 5:26 AM > > > On 02.08.2009, at 05:04, Jonathan Wilkes > wr

Re: tie over time signature

James E. Bailey wrote: >>Is there any way to get the tie to be transparent where it >>collides with the time signature? > >this is addressed in the Learning Manual under "Real music >example" Sort of. The "Real music example" is here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-lear

RE: tie over time signature

Hi Jonathan, > In the following, the tie is drawn through the time signature. > > \relative c'' { > b b b b~ > \time 5/4 > b2. b2 > } > > Is there any way to get the tie to be transparent where it collides with > the time signature? Yes: search the archives for Mark P’s “whiteoutTimeSignatures”

Re: tie over time signature

On 02.08.2009, at 05:04, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: Hello, In the following, the tie is drawn through the time signature. \relative c'' { b b b b~ \time 5/4 b2. b2 } Is there any way to get the tie to be transparent where it collides with the time signature?

Re: Tie at the beginning of the piece

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 13:12 +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > You can use the \repeatTie command to get the connecting tie before the > first note, see > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Long-repeats#Normal-repeats Thank you! This created the beginning tie. (I had tried be

Re: Tie at the beginning of the piece

You can use the \repeatTie command to get the connecting tie before the first note, see http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Long-repeats#Normal-repeats In this particular situation, it might also make sense to add invisible notes before and after the snippet and use ordina

Re: Tie question

Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Stefan, I can't manage to get a tie from a single note into a multi-voice section, like this: c~ << { c ... } \\ { ... } >> Is there any solution for this case? Yes: explicitly instantiate your Voice contexts: c ~ << { \voiceOne c ... } \new Voice { \voiceTwo

Re: Tie question

Hi Stefan, I can't manage to get a tie from a single note into a multi-voice section, like this: c~ << { c ... } \\ { ... } >> Is there any solution for this case? Yes: explicitly instantiate your Voice contexts: c ~ << { \voiceOne c ... } \new Voice { \voiceTwo ... } >> \oneVoice …

Re: Tie question

Stefan Waler wrote: Hi, I can't manage to get a tie from a single note into a multi-voice section, like this: c~ << { c ... } \\ { ... } >> Is there any solution for this case? Thanks! Stefan Yes. See Learning Manual 4.6.1: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond-lea

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

- Original Message - From: "Marco Caliari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 5:18 PM Subject: Re: Tie control-points delete another tie Thank you, Trevor. On the other hand, why cannot I modify the tie

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

2008/7/30 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > One of the whole goals of GDP was to make this easy -- you don't > need to find a doc editor who knows anything about tweaking ties > (or whatever else might be the issue in question); it just takes > **one user** to make a snippet, submit it to LSR

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:23:51 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trevor Ba__a wrote Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:35 PM > > > Maybe the different \tweaks should appear in the relevant sections > > of the manual concerning the object of the tweak -- in chords, > > tuplets, ties, etc. >

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

Trevor Bača wrote Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:35 PM On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote Here's a further solution to your problem which demonstrates how to use \tweak to change the shape of one tie within a chord. Thanks to Han-Wen for showing how this should be done. I've ma

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Marco > > Here's a further solution to your problem which demonstrates how to use > \tweak to change the shape of one tie within a chord. Thanks to Han-Wen for > showing how this should be done. I've made a note to add t

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

Marco Here's a further solution to your problem which demonstrates how to use \tweak to change the shape of one tie within a chord. Thanks to Han-Wen for showing how this should be done. I've made a note to add this to the docs. \new Staff << \key f \major \time 6/8 \new Voice { \voice

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

Hi Valentin Carl got back to you first, saving me the trouble :) I've nothing to add to his response. Trevor - Original Message - From: "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Saturday, J

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

2008/7/27 Carl Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've made a short snippet here that shows what appears to me to be the > central issue: Great! Indeed, I can see I hadn't understood well the nature of the problem. I have added your report (quasi verbatim) as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issue

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

Valentin Villenave gmail.com> writes: > > 2008/7/24 Trevor Daniels treda.co.uk>: > > But you were > > right originally, this is either a bug or LilyPond > > is overly sensitive. > > Greetings Trevor, > > I've re-re-read the whole discussion a few times, but I can't manage > to understand the

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

2008/7/24 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > But you were > right originally, this is either a bug or LilyPond > is overly sensitive. Greetings Trevor, I've re-re-read the whole discussion a few times, but I can't manage to understand the issue clearly enough to make a proper bug-report (been

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

Hi, My mail probably belongs better to the user list so I post it there... Trevor Daniels wrote: It's not clear what you are trying to achieve here, as the ties without the override look ok. I don't know about Marco's intentions but I once had a similar case. I got around by using both slurs

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

"Marco Caliari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Risto Vääräniemi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Marco Caliari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:03 AM Subject: Re: Tie control-points delete another

Re: Tie control-points delete another tie

Hi, My mail probably belongs better to the user list so I post it there... Trevor Daniels wrote: > It's not clear what you are trying to achieve here, > as the ties without the override look ok. I don't know about Marco's intentions but I once had a similar case. I got around by using both slurs

Re: Tie across triplet boundary

Thanks for your help. It works now. Mike Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 29.12.2007 (23:17), Michael Nelson wrote: > Hi guys. I'm a new user of Lilypond. I'm notating an old (out of copyright) > edition of Bach's Invention 1. I was happy to get through the first 5 bars > with re

Re: Tie across triplet boundary

On 29.12.2007 (23:17), Michael Nelson wrote: > Hi guys. I'm a new user of Lilypond. I'm notating an old (out of copyright) > edition of Bach's Invention 1. I was happy to get through the first 5 bars > with remarkably few problems. But I have hit a snag in bar 6. See the > snapshot of the o

Re: tie into polyphony question

thanks, but is it possible to tie more than one note ( < > ) into polyphony? And do I use the correct syntax for getting polyphonic and than homophonic again? (if I use \\ instead of \new Voice = "1" I get no tie at all...) ole Am 21.11.2007 um 05:17 schrieb Paul Scott: Ole Schmidt

Re: tie different chord

Citando Ezequiel Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ~ > in a f clef > > > > dosent work > On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: You need a *slur*, not a tie: ( ) Eduardo ___ Com o Click21 você tem sempre va

Re: tie different chord

~ in a f clef dosent work On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Please give an example of what you want to do. Clearly, you can only tie a note head to another note head of the same pitch. By default, LilyPond will add a tie for each matching note of a chord, but it's also

Re: tie different chord

Please give an example of what you want to do. Clearly, you can only tie a note head to another note head of the same pitch. By default, LilyPond will add a tie for each matching note of a chord, but it's also possible to specify ties separately for each note in the chord, see the section on "T

Re: tie attached on left side

> "Arvid" == Arvid Grøtting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Arvid> Graham Percival gmail.com> writes: >> Lilypond now produces binary eps files. See >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=157 Arvid> I get errors from lilypond-book now, possibly because I Arvid

Re: tie attached on left side

Graham Percival gmail.com> writes: > Lilypond now produces binary eps files. See > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=157 I get errors from lilypond-book now, possibly because I haven't updated the included files, but the BoundingBox is in the text-format header. The ugly sed t

Re: tie attached on left side

Arvid Grøtting wrote: Laura Conrad laymusic.org> writes: There's a more important problem (to me) that appeared in 2.9.23, so I'm not updating until somebody fixes or finds a good workaround for the lilypond-book staff alignment problem. Mine's stopped working, then? (I haven't checked.) O

Re: tie attached on left side

Laura Conrad laymusic.org> writes: > There's a more important problem (to me) that appeared in 2.9.23, so > I'm not updating until somebody fixes or finds a good workaround for > the lilypond-book staff alignment problem. Mine's stopped working, then? (I haven't checked.) Oh, well; it was an u

Re: tie attached on left side

> "Graham" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Graham> Laura Conrad wrote: Graham> \override LaissezVibrerTie #'direction = #-1 >> >> I tried several places to put that, and none of them worked. The >> attached doesn't seem to have any effect at all. This is o

Re: tie attached on left side

Laura Conrad wrote: Graham> \override LaissezVibrerTie #'direction = #-1 I tried several places to put that, and none of them worked. The attached doesn't seem to have any effect at all. This is on 2.9.22. It's a bug which was unfortunately fixed after 2.9.22. - Graham ___

Re: tie attached on left side

> "Graham" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Graham> Laura Conrad wrote: >> So then I looked at \laissezVibrer, which is indeed quite similar to >> what I want, but the default appearance is probably deliberately >> somewhat different from a normal tie. >>

Re: tie attached on left side

Laura Conrad wrote: So then I looked at \laissezVibrer, which is indeed quite similar to what I want, but the default appearance is probably deliberately somewhat different from a normal tie. Does someone know how to tweak the attached example so that the tie is up instead of down (important) an

Re: tie problem

Mats and Kieren, thanks again for your explanations of the << {} \\ {} >> construct (and its variants), and how to make ties cross the boundaries of the simultaneous music construct into the non-simultaneous music before or after it. Thanks to those explanations I was able to solve a problem, in a

Re: tie problem

On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:38:47PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > Steve D wrote: > >Thank you Kieren for that explanation. What about the converse case, > >where a tie begins inside a << { } \new Voice { } >> construct, at the > >end (in the second voice, and one wishes the tie to continue to the n

Re: tie problem

Steve D wrote: Thank you Kieren for that explanation. What about the converse case, where a tie begins inside a << { } \new Voice { } >> construct, at the end (in the second voice, and one wishes the tie to continue to the next note or chord outside that simultaneous music construct, like-- \r

Re: tie problem

On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 08:45:16PM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > Well, you've run into a subtlety of Lilypond that could, perhaps, be > better documented... ;-) > > Consider the following code snippet: > theMusic = \relative c' > { > 1 ~ | << 1\fermata \\ { s2 c4 c } >> \break >

Re: Tie from voices to chord (begginer)

Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi, Maurí cio: if I could get lilypond to draw the first c4 as a c2, (...) With Lilypond, *anything* is possible! ;-) (...) If you absolutely need the rest (in the second voice), I might be able to take a few seconds and whip up a solution. Best, Kieren. Cool!

Re: Tie from voices to chord (begginer)

Hi, Maurí cio: if I could get lilypond to draw the first c4 as a c2, while keeping that note time as a 1/4. Do you think that is possible? With Lilypond, *anything* is possible! ;-) theMusic = \relative c' { \time 2/4 \set tieWaitForNote = ##t c2*1/2~ e4~ 2 \set tieWaitFor

Re: Tie from voices to chord (begginer)

Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi, Maurí cio! I have two voices that I should tie to a chord. Is it possible to do that? Would the attached example for you? (...) theMusic = \relative c' { \time 2/4 \set tieWaitForNote = ##t c4~ e4~ 2 \set tieWaitForNote = ##f } No, it doesn'

Re: Tie from voices to chord (begginer)

Hi, Maurí cio! I have two voices that I should tie to a chord. Is it possible to do that? Would the attached example for you? I know it's not *exactly* what you were asking for -- it uses a convention of engraving that *fakes* two separate voices, rather than actually *being* two voices

Re: tie problem

I believe this approach could also work properly: << 1\arpeggio~ \\ s1 >> | << 1\fermata \\ {r2 r4 b'32 (c d e f g a b)} >> i.e., a second "space" voice is added to the first compass. However, don't take it as example of good style, since I've just started to learn Lily. Best, Mauríc

Re: tie problem

Note that this already is described fairly clearly both in "Basic Polyphony" and "Explicitly Instantiating Voices". However, if you have any idea on how to make it even clearer/easier to find, then they are off course welcome. Graham Percival wrote: Hi Rainer, Fell free to help. See http://li

Re: tie problem

Hi Rainer, Fell free to help. See http://lilypond.org/web/devel/participating/documentation-adding - Graham Rainer Hahnekamp wrote: Hi Kieren, thank you very much vor answer. Your snippet solved the problem and btw. it makes completely sense. Should really be better integrated into the docu

Re: tie problem

Hi Kieren, thank you very much vor answer. Your snippet solved the problem and btw. it makes completely sense. Should really be better integrated into the documentation. Greetings, Rainer Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi, Rainer: > >> I've following code: >> 1\arpeggio ~ | << 1\fermata \\ {r2 r4 b

Re: tie problem

Hi, Rainer: I've following code: 1\arpeggio ~ | << 1\fermata \\ {r2 r4 b'32 (c d e f g a b)} >> According to the documentation the two "" should be tied. Unfortunately this is not the case. Could you help me please? Well, you've run into a subtlety of Lilypond that could, perhaps, be bet

Re: tie collision

On 9/1/06, Steve D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 03:20:47PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote: > I sure did, huh? > I have 2.8.6 at the moment. > { > \time 4/4 > \set tieWaitForNote = ##t > c'8~ e'~ g'~ <> > } The problem you see (a tie of one note of an arpeggio connecting to the

Re: tie collision

On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 03:20:47PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote: > I sure did, huh? > I have 2.8.6 at the moment. > { > \time 4/4 > \set tieWaitForNote = ##t > c'8~ e'~ g'~ <> > } The problem you see (a tie of one note of an arpeggio connecting to the wrong note of the following chord) existed in t

Re: tie collision

I sure did, huh? I have 2.8.6 at the moment. { \time 4/4 \set tieWaitForNote = ##t c'8~ e'~ g'~ <> } Thanks. -Chuckk On 8/27/06, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Did you forget to attach some example code or example output? Also, don't forget to tell what LilyPond version you use.

Re: tie collision

Did you forget to attach some example code or example output? Also, don't forget to tell what LilyPond version you use. /Mats Quoting Chuckk Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi. In experimenting with other things, I noted that this tie collides. The upper tie, on the G, collides with the noteh

Re: Tie/slur bug in 2.9.11?

John Wiedenhoeft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I try the following: > > \version "2.9.11" > > erga = {\once \override NoteHead #'style = #'diamond a} > para = {< \parenthesize a>} > > { > a ~ \erga ~ \erga > a( \erga) \erga( a) > a ~ \para ~ \para > a( \para) \para( a) > } > > I get: > > GN

Re: Tie Problems in a lengthy File-Anybody cares to look at it?

Please always tell what LilyPond version you use. When trying to reproduce the problem with a short fragment, did you try to include exactly two lines of the original score with an explicit \break where the line break is in the original? /Mats Quoting Mehmet Okonsar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi

Re: Tie between voices

I'm afraid it's impossible to tie notes between voices. From your example I think you want something like this: 8.-> << {\voiceOne 16~ c'4~ c4.} \new Voice {\voiceTwo \stemUp 4*1/4~ \stemDown 8 8~ 8. 16 r8} >> \oneVoice d32( c32 bf32 a32 | bf2->)~ I've made the in voice Two a crochet t

Re: tie behavior (was: New slur/tie behaviour)

Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, regarding general default tie rules or behavior: Well, AFAIK engraving conventions are: * outer ties point outward * double directions for seconds * direction otherwise determined by vertical position. --- --- Piano is my instrument, and as a

Re: tie-configuration question

Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2.~ \override TieColumn #'tie-configuration = > > #'((0 . -1) (2 . 1)) > > I don't understand the problem: if I change the 2 to 4, the tie moves > up (2.7.8 cvs). > Well it doesn't in 2.7.7, and since I can't use 2.7.8 because of

Re: tie-configuration question

Henrik Frisk wrote: I think the recent discussions on LilyPond's new tie behaviour has shown one thing: To a large degree it is up to musical style and personal preference - which makes the tie-configuration command so important (to me anyways). 2.~ \override TieColumn #'tie-config

Re: tie rewrite

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > results for the Tie rewrite are at > > http://localhost/lilypond/doc/v2.7/Documentation/topdocs/out-www/NEWS.html Sorry, but that should be: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/topdocs/out-www/NEWS.html __

Re: tie rewrite

On Monday 22 August 2005 19.46, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > hi, > > results for the Tie rewrite are at > > http://localhost/lilypond/doc/v2.7/Documentation/topdocs/out-www/NEWS.html .. which of course should be: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/topdocs/out-www/NEWS.html Looks great! -- E

Re: Tie a tremolando - tremolo tied to chord

Thanks for the hint, I've added a version of it to the manual. /Mats Steve D wrote: A while back I asked about the possibility of, and then sponsored, a feature to tie grace note and other arpeggios to a following chord. Han-Wen created the \set tieWaitForNote = ##t (or ##f, as the case ma

Re: Tie problem

Hi All, Thanks for the replies. They have given me several successful solutions to the problem. Cheers, Graeme ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Tie problem

Thanks for the correction. /Hans -- Proud user of Lilypond Music Typesetting Tools http://www.lilypond.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Tie problem

Mats Bengtsson wrote: Maurizio Tomasi wrote: The reason why Lilypond is not behaving as expected is, when you use <<>> Lily creates a new voice (by the way, why are you using "\\"?). The solution is to include the note to tie in the <<>> construct as well: \score { \new Staff { \rel

Re: Tie problem

Maurizio Tomasi wrote: The reason why Lilypond is not behaving as expected is, when you use <<>> Lily creates a new voice (by the way, why are you using "\\"?). The solution is to include the note to tie in the <<>> construct as well: \score { \new Staff { \relative c' {

Re: Tie problem

Graeme Evans wrote: Hi, I'm a new user of Lilypond, with quite a bit of experience with Score (some professional). I am having problems placing a tie between two bars, the 1st of which contains a whole note, and the second 4 quarter notes (all the same note, obviously. There is no problem with t

Re: Tie problem

Hi. > {< s4\!}>> > c4 c c c} > > This renders the 2 bars correctly, except that the tie does not print. This works: %- \version "2.4.2" \score { \relative c'' { \time 4/4 \new Voice { << { c1~ } {s4 s4\< s4\! \> s4\!} >> c4 c c c } } } %- [Note the absence o

Re: Tie problem

Easier and better is to keep the spacing notes in the same Voice context. The << {...} \\ {...} >> is only needed when the music actually splits into two separate voices which need separate directions for slurs, stems and so on. If you just remove the "\\" from your original example, it will work e

Re: Tie problem

> > {< s4\!}>> > c4 c c c} > Try something like << { c1 ~ c4 c c c } \\ {s4 s4\< s4\! \> s4\! s1 } >> HTH/Hans -- Proud user of Lilypond Music Typesetting Tools http://www.lilypond.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://l

Re: tie on first and second! alternative?

Search the mailing lists for: tie alternative ending /Mats Albert Einstein wrote: I want to obtain a tie that joins the last chord before first alternative with identical chord in first and second alternative. < a b c>~ \alternative { {} { < a b c> } } This above command produc

Re: Tie behavior

On Friday 09 July 2004 19.49, Shamus wrote: > Hi all, > > First of all, let me say that I'm very impressed with lilypond and I > appreciate all of the hard work that the developers have poured into it. > And with that, here's some criticism: ;-) Ties can, by their nature, not be done between diffe

Re: Tie for second ending?

Search the mailing list archives for tie second volta Note that we know have predefined macros \hideNotes and \unHideNotes to make notes invisible. /Mats Thomas Scharkowski wrote: Hello list, I have a note tied to alternative endings. How can I get the tie for the 2nd ending? Thank you, Thomas

Re: Tie bug?

I do not agree. Why should the natural be there? With break it looks even more like a bug. What do you think? Thomas > On Friday 23 January 2004 13:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Mats Bengtsson encouraged me to send the following example: > > > > \score{ > >\notes{ > > \key a \major > >

Re: Tie bug?

On Friday 23 January 2004 13:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Mats Bengtsson encouraged me to send the following example: > > \score{ >\notes{ > \key a \major > \partial 8 g8 ~ | g2 ~ g8 fis4. | > } > > This produces a natural on the last g which should not be there!? Should be

Re: tie and slur shapes

Richard Lyons wrote: This is quite a learning curve! I have to use two voices in some bars, so I end up needing to carry the two voices to wherever phrasing slurs lead. Sometimes I have to put the same note in both voices and make one stem transparent, so as to include all ties and slurs. F

Re: tie not showing up (lilypond 1.6.5)

Kev, Doh! I feel stupid. Thanks for the help. That works fine. -jeff --- Kev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I'm facing now is trivial, but annoying. In > the > > verseNotes section, towards the end (3rd measure > from > > the end), I have a tie between two notes (the > b-flat > > and g). Fo

<    1   2   3   4   5   >