On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 08:30 -0500, Andrew A. Cashner wrote:
Phil,
You're absolutely right (and I apologize if I suggested you didn't
know that)---as you say, my terms weren't precise either. In medieval
and Renaissance theory, C is tempus imperfectum cum prolatione minore,
cut C is tempus
-- Forwarded message --
From: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
To: Patrick or Cynthia Karl pck...@mac.com, lilypond-user@gnu.org
Cc:
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 08:45:46 +0100
Subject: Re: Variable length bars
- Original Message - From: Patrick or Cynthia Karl
Phil,
You're absolutely right (and I apologize if I suggested you didn't
know that)---as you say, my terms weren't precise either. In medieval
and Renaissance theory, C is tempus imperfectum cum prolatione minore,
cut C is tempus imperfectum cum prolatione maiore; in other words,
both are duple