Yes, playing with different combinations of ##f (an idea I've never thought
about) and different values seems to do the trick.
Thanks, Leo.
El vie, 14 jun 2024 a las 12:27, Leo Correia de Verdier (<
leo.correia.de.verd...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Setting
> \override
Hi Leo (and Federico!),
> Setting
> \override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f
> could perhaps also be an option.
Oh, yes… much better than my “nuclear” \ignore option!
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.25.11"
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\override
Setting
\override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = ##f
could perhaps also be an option.
> 13 juni 2024 kl. 16:49 skrev Federico Sarudiansky :
>
> Hi again, Kieren!
>
> Excellent! However I wonder if there is a more general approach. Something
> «allowing» the slurs not taking
Hi Federico,
> How can I overlap the perfect tie (slur) in A with the mark position in B and
> C so to use the .whiteout and .layer properties to put the slur/tie behind
> the mark and save some vertical space?
Maybe something like this…?
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.25.11"
\relative c'''
Hi Federico,
> However I wonder if there is a more general approach. Something «allowing»
> the slurs not taking the rehearsal marks into consideration when defining its
> shape parameters.
This is fairly “nuclear”, but:
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.25.11"
ignoreV =
\propertyTweak
Hi again, Kieren!
Excellent! However I wonder if there is a more general approach. Something
«allowing» the slurs not taking the rehearsal marks into consideration when
defining its shape parameters.
All the best!
F.
El jue, 13 jun 2024 a las 11:28, Kieren MacMillan (<
Hi.
Please consider the following:
\version "2.25.15"
\relative c''' {
g1~ \mark \default g1
\override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = #1
\override Tie.outside-staff-priority = #2
g1~ \mark \default g1
\override Slur.outside-staff-priority = #2
g1 ( \mark \default e1 )
