Re: Removing Empty Staves [2.12 vs 2.14]

2011-09-28 Thread Xavier Scheuer
2011/9/28 Alberto Simões al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt: Hello It seems that the 2.12 command       \RemoveEmptyStaffContext is, in 2.14,       \Staff \RemoveEmptyStaves But the behavior is not exactly the same. In the attached image, left is 2.14, right is 2.12. How to get the 2.12

Re: Removing Empty Staves [2.12 vs 2.14]

2011-09-28 Thread Alberto Simões
On 28/09/2011 12:05, Xavier Scheuer wrote: 2011/9/28 Alberto Simõesal...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt: Hello It seems that the 2.12 command \RemoveEmptyStaffContext is, in 2.14, \Staff \RemoveEmptyStaves But the behavior is not exactly the same. In the attached image, left is

Re: Removing Empty Staves [2.12 vs 2.14]

2011-09-28 Thread Alberto Simões
ok, fixed :) On 28/09/2011 12:13, Alberto Simões wrote: \context { \PianoStaff \remove Keep_alive_together_engraver \Staff \RemoveEmptyStaves \override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t } use two contexts :) and it seems to work. Thanks -- Alberto Simoes CEHUM

Re: Removing Empty Staves [2.12 vs 2.14]

2011-09-28 Thread Xavier Scheuer
2011/9/28 Alberto Simões al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt: Hello Trying \context { \PianoStaff \remove Keep_alive_together_engraver \Staff \RemoveEmptyStaves \override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t } But I get complains: _.ly:94:6: error: syntax

Re: Removing Empty Staves [2.12 vs 2.14]

2011-09-28 Thread Urs Liska
Do you use a PianoStaff in your example? I think this has been changed on purpose in order to keep PianoStaff-s intact - as the pianist generally will prefer an empty staff over a removed one. Am 28.09.2011 12:48, schrieb Alberto Simões: Hello It seems that the 2.12 command