on my scoring
> for rock/funk band, and I have everything under control due to the great
> help I've received here. One final sticking point is that I like to mark
> repeat signs underneath with a "2x" or "4x". I've been using tweaked
> \marks:
>
>
construct an example--I'm working on my scoring
> for rock/funk band, and I have everything under control due to the great
> help I've received here. One final sticking point is that I like to mark
> repeat signs underneath with a "2x" or "4x". I've been us
oint is that I like to mark repeat signs underneath with
> a "2x" or "4x". I've been using tweaked \marks:
>
> \tweak direction #DOWN \mark "4x"
>
> Problem is, if the closing repeat mark is at the end of a line of music as it
> decides to
I'm not quite sure how to construct an example--I'm working on my scoring
for rock/funk band, and I have everything under control due to the great
help I've received here.
One final sticking point is that I like to mark repeat signs underneath
with a "2x" or "4x"
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 08:22, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> Le 16/04/2021 à 23:19, Peter Crighton a écrit :
> > when using \magnifyStaff it seems as though the dots of a percent
> > repeat sign will scale accordingly, but not the slash. I cannot
> > imagine this is expected behaviour.
> >
> > \versi
Le 16/04/2021 à 23:19, Peter Crighton a écrit :
Hello all,
when using \magnifyStaff it seems as though the dots of a percent
repeat sign will scale accordingly, but not the slash. I cannot
imagine this is expected behaviour.
\version "2.23.2"
{
\magnifyStaff 0.5
\repeat percent 2 {
Hello all,
when using \magnifyStaff it seems as though the dots of a percent repeat
sign will scale accordingly, but not the slash. I cannot imagine this is
expected behaviour.
\version "2.23.2"
{
\magnifyStaff 0.5
\repeat percent 2 {
c'1
}
}
I also could not find any method to manuall
: Piers Snell; Andrew Bernard; lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: Re: Repeat signs not working for me
Am Freitag, den 09.10.2020, 14:01 + schrieb Piers Snell:
> Thanks again...
>
> I think I'm going to have to stick with my current version until someone with
> better expertise
Am Freitag, den 09.10.2020, 14:01 + schrieb Piers Snell:
> Thanks again...
>
> I think I'm going to have to stick with my current version until someone with
> better expertise puts together a package for Linux Mint, whose software
> manager *still* points at 2.16.2. Someone will get around
lypond-User Mailing
List
Subject: Re: Repeat signs not working for me
Thanks again...
I think I'm going to have to stick with my current version until someone with
better expertise puts together a package for Linux Mint, whose software manager
*still* points at 2.16.2. Someone will get aro
g List
Subject: Re: Repeat signs not working for me
Many thanks -- I had in fact tried to install from that script, but probably
hadn't thoroughly uninstalled the 2.16.2.
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
From: Jean Abou Samra
Sent: 09 Octo
Thanks again...
I think I'm going to have to stick with my current version until
someone with better expertise puts together a package for Linux Mint,
whose software manager *still* points at 2.16.2. Someone will get
around to it sooner or later. I've tried building from source, but
the con
iers Snell
Sent: 09 October 2020 14:01
To: Andrew Bernard ; lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: Re: Repeat signs not working for me
Thanks again...
I think I'm going to have to stick with my current version until someone with
better expertise puts together a package for Linux Mint, whose s
t; way of doing things.
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
From: lilypond-user on
behalf of Andrew Bernard
Sent: 09 October 2020 13:21
To: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: Re: Repeat signs not working for me
Any problems - ask the list. There ar
Any problems - ask the list. There are no stupid questions. If you
can, always provide a Minimal Working Example (MWE) which you in fact
did.
Once more, welcome to our wonderful community. Lilypond can me made to
do anything (except some of the things in my New Complexity scores
:-))
Andrew
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
From: lilypond-user on
behalf of Andrew Bernard
Sent: 09 October 2020 11:49
To: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: Re: Repeat signs not working for me
Hi Piers,
You can't just make up barlines. Please
Hi Piers,
Yes, welcome. Forgive me for sounding harsh. but asking about a
version that is effectively completed unsuppported in practice and on
the list is roughly the same as asking for support for WIndows ME now
on a WIndows 10 list. Not sure where you even get 2.16 from now!
Also, in my hurry
Newbie... I suspect I may be doing something very stupid.
Thank you in advance for your patience.
Piers.
Hello,
Welcome here.
\version "2.16.2" indicates that you are using an old version of
LilyPond. Everything seems fine over here with version 2.20.0. Attached
is the output.
LilyPond 2
Hi Piers,
You can't just make up barlines. Please read the NR, Section 1.2.5 for 2.21.6.
New bar line types can be defined with \defineBarLine.
And, um, are you seriously using 2.16.2? Why? That is so utterly out
of date that I am shocked. Even stable version 2.18 has been out for
so many years
Newbie... I suspect I may be doing something very stupid.
Thank you in advance for your patience.
Piers.
\version "2.16.2"
\language "english"
\relative c' { % for me, these all show as expected apart from one
f1 \bar "|"
f1 \bar "."
g1 \bar "||"
a1 \bar ".|"
b1 \bar ".." %
Am Sa., 2. Feb. 2019 um 20:45 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
> Am Sa., 2. Feb. 2019 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill
> :
> > Alternately, the \defineBarLine function could be split:
> >
> > \defineBarLine "bar" #'("end" "begin" "span")
> > % becomes
> > \setBarLineSpanning "bar" "span
Hi Aaron,
I'm a bit verbose below (even repeating things you already know),
because we're on the user-list and I hope more folk gets involved that
way.
Am Sa., 2. Feb. 2019 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill :
>
> On 2019-02-02 2:29 am, Thomas Morley wrote:
> > Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 20:19 Uhr schr
Hi,
I probably don't understand all the implications and I am certainly not
suggesting to change the function signature. But while we are at it:
A definition is usually “name” = “the thing to be defined”.
In the current \defineBarLine function, I always wondered why the first
argument contains a
On 2019-02-02 2:29 am, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 20:19 Uhr schrieb Malte Meyn
:
Am 01.02.19 um 18:42 schrieb Aaron Hill:
> That very much sounds like a bug and should be reported. The final
> argument is the span setting which should be agnostic of start and end
> styles and
Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 20:19 Uhr schrieb Malte Meyn :
>
> Am 01.02.19 um 18:42 schrieb Aaron Hill:
> > On 2019-02-01 9:04 am, Malte Meyn wrote:
> >> Am 01.02.19 um 16:53 schrieb Aaron Hill:
> >>> "" is already a valid bar line that has an empty glyph, so just
> >>> extend that one:
> >>>
> >>> %%%
Am 01.02.19 um 18:42 schrieb Aaron Hill:
On 2019-02-01 9:04 am, Malte Meyn wrote:
Am 01.02.19 um 16:53 schrieb Aaron Hill:
"" is already a valid bar line that has an empty glyph, so just
extend that one:
\version "2.19.82"
\defineBarLine "-span" #'("|" "|" "|")
\layout { \context { \Sco
On 2019-02-01 9:04 am, Malte Meyn wrote:
Am 01.02.19 um 16:53 schrieb Aaron Hill:
"" is already a valid bar line that has an empty glyph, so just extend
that one:
\version "2.19.82"
\defineBarLine "-span" #'("|" "|" "|")
\layout { \context { \Score defaultBarType = "-span" } }
\new Staff
Am 01.02.19 um 16:53 schrieb Aaron Hill:
"" is already a valid bar line that has an empty glyph, so just extend
that one:
\version "2.19.82"
\defineBarLine "-span" #'("|" "|" "|")
\layout { \context { \Score defaultBarType = "-span" } }
\new StaffGroup << \new Staff \repeat unfold 12 b'
On 2019-02-01 7:24 am, Malte Meyn wrote:
Am 01.02.19 um 14:19 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
On my system, this does (in 2.18.82 as well as current master), this
does "the right thing", but only because of
The “right thing” only by accident:
\defineBarLine "m" #'("||" "||" "||")
has the s
Am 01.02.19 um 14:19 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
On my system, this does (in 2.18.82 as well as current master), this
does "the right thing", but only because of
The “right thing” only by accident:
\defineBarLine "m" #'("||" "||" "||")
has the same effect (single Mensurstriche between
I wonder why I haven’t had this idea several years ago but how about
this?:
\version "2.19.82"
\defineBarLine "m" #'("" "" "|")
\layout {
\context {
\Score
defaultBarType = "m"
}
}
mus = \relative {
c' d e f g a b c b a g f e d c \bar ":|."
}
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff \
Am 01.02.19 um 11:37 schrieb Bernhard Kleine:
I have the following and cannot find a way to have the repeat/volta
signs displayed:
I wonder why I haven’t had this idea several years ago but how about this?:
\version "2.19.82"
\defineBarLine "m" #'("" "" "|")
\layout {
\context {
\Sco
I tried once also, obviously not on the correct place.
Thanks a lot.
Bernhard
Am 01.02.2019 um 11:51 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Bernhard Kleine writes:
>
>> I have the following and cannot find a way to have the repeat/volta
>> signs displayed:
> Seems pretty simple to me.
>
>
>
--
spitzhalde9
D
Bernhard Kleine writes:
> I have the following and cannot find a way to have the repeat/volta
> signs displayed:
Seems pretty simple to me.
\version "2.19.82"
\language "deutsch"
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\consists "Melody_engraver"
\override Stem #'neutral-direction = #'()
}
I have the following and cannot find a way to have the repeat/volta
signs displayed:
\version "2.19.82"
\language "deutsch"
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\consists "Melody_engraver"
\override Stem #'neutral-direction = #'()
}
}
global = {
\hide Staff.BarLine
\key c \major
\time
ext:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Repeat-signs-bar-lines-in-markup-tp140533p140733.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
dak wrote
> Eluze <
> eluzew@
> > writes:
>
>> the big difference is that you can scale it in the \markup where you use
>> it,
>> e.g.
>> \markup {
>> \fontsize #14 \bar-line #".|:"
>> \fontsize #-4 \bar-line #".|:"
&
Eluze writes:
> the big difference is that you can scale it in the \markup where you use it,
> e.g.
> \markup {
> \fontsize #14 \bar-line #".|:"
> \fontsize #-4 \bar-line #".|:"
> }
> will render two differently sized start repeat signs, whereas t
- but also #(layout-set-staff-size nn) combined with an \override of
the staff-space = #m works.
the big difference is that you can scale it in the \markup where you use it,
e.g.
\markup {
\fontsize #14 \bar-line #".|:"
\fontsize #-4 \bar-line #".|:"
}
will render two differently sized
On 08/02/13 23:01, Eluze wrote:
Thomas Morley wrote
below a markup-command to print bar-lines.
For now it is limited to bar-lines containing thick-bar-line,
thin-bar-line and/or colon-bar-line.
Every additional bar-line (dashed, dotted etc) would need an
additional construction-procedure.
\bar-
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Am 08.02.2013 13:01, schrieb Eluze:
>
[...]
>
>> certainly a function for the LSR!!
>>
> +1
>
> ...or to be included somewhere in the sources? I did not look closely to
> the code,
> but if there is a broader intersection between the stuff in
Am 08.02.2013 13:01, schrieb Eluze:
Thomas Morley wrote
below a markup-command to print bar-lines.
For now it is limited to bar-lines containing thick-bar-line,
thin-bar-line and/or colon-bar-line.
Every additional bar-line (dashed, dotted etc) would need an
additional construction-procedure.
\
;
>
> %
and also "2.17.11" - thanks!
this seems much better than the solution with \markup \score …
also, the resulting bar lines are scalable!
certainly a function for the LSR!!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble
Hi,
below a markup-command to print bar-lines.
For now it is limited to bar-lines containing thick-bar-line,
thin-bar-line and/or colon-bar-line.
Every additional bar-line (dashed, dotted etc) would need an
additional construction-procedure.
\bar-line follows the procedures in bar-line.scm, heavi
raver based in Mainz, Germany
http://www.petercrighton.de
2013/2/7 Marc Hohl :
Am 06.02.2013 18:46, schrieb Peter Crighton:
Hi List,
is there some way to put bar lines, or more specifically repeat signs,
inside a text markup? Other than recreating them with the help of
\draw-line and \draw-circ
hton.de
2013/2/7 Marc Hohl :
> Am 06.02.2013 18:46, schrieb Peter Crighton:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> is there some way to put bar lines, or more specifically repeat signs,
>> inside a text markup? Other than recreating them with the help of
>> \draw-line and \d
Am 06.02.2013 18:46, schrieb Peter Crighton:
Hi List,
is there some way to put bar lines, or more specifically repeat signs,
inside a text markup? Other than recreating them with the help of
\draw-line and \draw-circle?
I found a rather clumsy workaround:
\markup {
\line {
Here is a
Hi List,
is there some way to put bar lines, or more specifically repeat signs,
inside a text markup? Other than recreating them with the help of
\draw-line and \draw-circle?
--
Peter Crighton | Musician & Music Engraver based in Mainz, Germany
http://www.petercrighto
don't you let Lilyponds built-in functions take place!?
\repeat volta 2 { … } \repeat volta 2 { … } already sets the correct bars!
with more than one \bar override Lilypond will only print the last bar
instruction encountered.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/begi
Depending on context, a particular begin-repeat sign or end-repeat sign will
refuse to print even though others are printing fine within the same document.
Gmane would not allow me to post a snippet, but one can be found at
http://pefty.elementfx.com/repeat%20sign%20problem.ly
Please share any i
pride with the results ;)
Anyway, the point is that I am having some troubles with repeat signs
because I cannot get what I pretend. I have readed the man of lilypond
and look into the options of jEdit but I hadn't luck. Here is the work
I am doing now and my problem is exactly at the final se
Hello everyone again!
There is a long time ago I don't write here but lately I am learning
more about lilypond and I feel very pride with the results ;)
Anyway, the point is that I am having some troubles with repeat signs
because I cannot get what I pretend. I have readed the man of lil
Seems like a bug to me!
Example:
\version "2.4.2"
\relative c' {
\repeat volta 2 {c d e16 f } e f g4 |
}
/Mats
Erik Ronström wrote:
According to the regression tests, LilyPond does not typeset beams
across manual repeat signs. That is true. However, it does place beams
across re
According to the regression tests, LilyPond does not typeset beams
across manual repeat signs. That is true. However, it does place beams
across repeat-voltas, if the repeat sign is mid-bar. Is there a way to
avoid that without using manual beaming?
I use LilyPond 2.2.4.
I tried so search the
54 matches
Mail list logo
