> Cool. We should definitely discuss the proper set of options and
> include that to LilyPond (or if that's for some reason not desired
> to openLilyLib).
Definitely!
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Am 21.03.2017 um 12:05 schrieb Malte Meyn:
>
> Am 21.03.2017 um 11:44 schrieb Malte Meyn:
>> Or if you don’t want variants for all \grace variants (i. e. \grace,
>> \slashedGrace, \appoggiatura, \acciaccatura, \afterGrace), just make a
>> function that takes a music expression and scales it to
Am 21.03.2017 um 11:44 schrieb Malte Meyn:
> Or if you don’t want variants for all \grace variants (i. e. \grace,
> \slashedGrace, \appoggiatura, \acciaccatura, \afterGrace), just make a
> function that takes a music expression and scales it to 1. Maybe this
> could also be nice for cadenza-like
Am 21.03.2017 um 11:04 schrieb Urs Liska:
>
>
> Am 21.03.2017 um 10:46 schrieb Malte Meyn:
>> (By the way: I think that the way LilyPond handles it (using “grace” and
>> “real time”) is pretty good but not perfect. \grace only needs grace
>> time but \afterGrace needs real time for vertical
Am 21.03.2017 um 11:04 schrieb Urs Liska:
>
> Am 21.03.2017 um 10:46 schrieb Malte Meyn:
>> (By the way: I think that the way LilyPond handles it (using “grace” and
>> “real time”) is pretty good but not perfect. \grace only needs grace
>> time but \afterGrace needs real time for vertical
Am 21.03.2017 um 10:46 schrieb Malte Meyn:
> (By the way: I think that the way LilyPond handles it (using “grace” and
> “real time”) is pretty good but not perfect. \grace only needs grace
> time but \afterGrace needs real time for vertical alignment (but not for
> input of the notes)—it would
