Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> writes:
> Esteemed colleagues,
>
> There is suddenly a lot of activity in the area of Scheme questions
> and answers (which is great!). Should we start a dedicated mailing
> list , since it is quite a specialised are
> I don't really agree with your characterization of Scheme as a
> "quite specialised area" of LilyPond: it's a rather integral part of
> its workings and interfaces, quite different from the role, say, Lua
> plays in LuaTeX. So I don't see much of a point in a separate
> mailing list.
+1
quite different from the role, say, Lua
> > plays in LuaTeX. So I don't see much of a point in a separate
> > mailing list.
>
> +1
In scheme that would be:
(1+ ...)
But yes, please keep those scheme questions here.
Cheers, RalfD
Am 17.11.2015 um 14:35 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Esteemed colleagues,
>>
>> There is suddenly a lot of activity in the area of Scheme questions
>> and answers (which is great!). Should we start a dedicated
Esteemed colleagues,
There is suddenly a lot of activity in the area of Scheme questions and answers
(which is great!). Should we start a dedicated mailing list ,
since it is quite a specialised area and the topic may not be of interest to
general lilypond engravers? Just an idea. The list
Am 2015-11-17 14:24, schrieb Andrew Bernard:
Should we start a dedicated mailing
list , since it is quite a specialised area and the
topic may not be of interest to general lilypond engravers?
Many questions of "general lilypond engravers" lead to a scheme answer.
So probably it wouldn't be
So, Scheme matters stay here. It is good to see a lot more activity in this
area on the list recently – the more Schemers, the better.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user