Re: Single-note tremolos

Hi Carl, Thank you for doing this. I believe all of these adjustments are improvements already. If you have [as you’ve suggested you will have] parameters for most of the settings, with reasonable defaults pre-set, this will be a nice step forward. Best, Kieren.

Re: Single-note tremolos

Werner, Thanks for the feedback. On 5/16/16 1:35 PM, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > >> In reviewing Gould (p. 222), I found several defaults in LilyPond >> that go against Gould's recommendations. >> >> 1) The tremolo lines are too wide (they should be only as wide as a >>

Re: Single-note tremolos

2016-05-16 22:52 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen : > > > On 5/16/16 1:20 PM, "Malte Meyn" wrote: > >> >>Am 16.05.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >>> 2) The tremolo lines are too thick (they should be thinner than beams, >>>but >>> in LilyPond they are the

Re: Single-note tremolos

Hi Carl, bringing this up and already offering a solution is really nice. Thank you for your work! I can only tell what my gut feeling is: 1) I like the wider tremolos more for whole notes 2) Again, I like the thick lines more 3) The tremolos inside the staff look much cleaner/better. 4)

Re: Single-note tremolos

On 5/16/16 1:20 PM, "Malte Meyn" wrote: > >Am 16.05.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >> 2) The tremolo lines are too thick (they should be thinner than beams, >>but >> in LilyPond they are the same thickness). > >IMO your variant isn¹t much better: The tremolo beams

Re: Single-note tremolos

> In reviewing Gould (p. 222), I found several defaults in LilyPond > that go against Gould's recommendations. > > 1) The tremolo lines are too wide (they should be only as wide as a >crotchet note head). This is a matter of taste, it seems. I have seen scores where the width of tremolos

Re: Single-note tremolos

Am 16.05.2016 um 21:20 schrieb Malte Meyn: IMO your variant isn’t much better: I should have first thanked you to work on this topic at all (and your changes 1 and 3 are indeed worth to be included into LilyPond; 2 with some further changes, I have no opinion on 4 but these thoughts let me

Re: Single-note tremolos

Am 16.05.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Carl Sorensen: 2) The tremolo lines are too thick (they should be thinner than beams, but in LilyPond they are the same thickness). IMO your variant isn’t much better: The tremolo beams look *very* slim now. Two ideas: 1. Does Gould say something about *how

Single-note tremolos

Dave Higgins noted that for notes outside of the staff, tremolo indications collided with ledger lines. In reviewing Gould (p. 222), I found several defaults in LilyPond that go against Gould's recommendations. 1) The tremolo lines are too wide (they should be only as wide as a crotchet note

Single-note tremolos

Dave Higgins noted that for notes outside of the staff, tremolo indications collided with ledger lines. In reviewing Gould (p. 222), I found several defaults in LilyPond that go against Gould's recommendations. 1) The tremolo lines are too wide (they should be only as wide as a crotchet note