On Jan 17, 2008 10:35 AM, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trevor Bača wrote:
Is there a way to get normal (noncrosss-staff) beams to likewise sit
at that same vertical position?
(IOW, I'm looking for both flat and vertically aligned; Rune's #+inf.0
gets flat ... now for the
Try Rune's suggestion from
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-12/msg00147.html
which solves the same problem without any need to manually specify the
position.
/Mats
Trevor Bača wrote:
Hi,
Anyone have a smarter way to set Beam #'positions in the third beam
grouping
2008/1/15, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try Rune's suggestion from
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-12/msg00147.html
which solves the same problem without any need to manually specify the
position.
Neat!
Added as http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=375
Cheers,
Hi,
Anyone have a smarter way to set Beam #'positions in the third beam grouping
below?
%%% BEGIN %%%
\version 2.11.34
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff = RH {
\time 9/8
\override Staff.VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-10 . 20)
\override Stem #'direction = #down
