On 2019-03-22 1:32 am, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On 3/21/19, Aaron Hill wrote:
In an attempt to hide the Scheme-ness of the above approach, I put
together the following music function which replaces placeholder
strings
within the provided markup with the output of the specified formatter
Valentin Villenave writes:
> On 3/21/19, Aaron Hill wrote:
>> In an attempt to hide the Scheme-ness of the above approach, I put
>> together the following music function which replaces placeholder strings
>> within the provided markup with the output of the specified formatter
>> function:
>
>
On 3/21/19, Aaron Hill wrote:
> In an attempt to hide the Scheme-ness of the above approach, I put
> together the following music function which replaces placeholder strings
> within the provided markup with the output of the specified formatter
> function:
Hi Aaron,
I like what you’re doing! I
Hi folks,
There have been a few mentions of rehearsal marks recently and wanting
to customize the appearance of \mark \default. Using \mark \markup
gives you much freedom at the cost of requiring one to manually manage
the numbering/naming of these marks.
The (what-I-presume-is-official)
