Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread Martin Tarenskeen
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Phil Holmes wrote: There were a couple of errors in the snippet you posted - the version number should be in inverted commas "", and you have "arpeggi" which I assume should be arpeggio. I personally would prefer it if lilypond snippets and example code in this mailingl

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 3 October 2010 14:36, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > I personally would prefer it if lilypond snippets and example code in this > mailinglist were posted as separate attachement(s) to the mail. I then just > simply can save the snippet to disk. Now I first have to copy and paste the > lilypond co

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread James Lowe
Hello, On 03/10/2010 13:36, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Phil Holmes wrote: There were a couple of errors in the snippet you posted - the version number should be in inverted commas "", and you have "arpeggi" which I assume should be arpeggio. I personally would prefer it i

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:37:59PM +0100, James Lowe wrote: > 1. Open Email > 2. Read Email. Spot problem. Reply Yes. > If someone sends an ly file that is umpty-thrumpty lines long let's add one more point: 2b. if you can't spot the problem, point them at http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-03 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 10/3/10 6:36 AM, "Martin Tarenskeen" wrote: > > > > On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Phil Holmes wrote: > >> There were a couple of errors in the snippet you posted - the version number >> should be in inverted commas "", and you >> have "arpeggi" which I assume should be arpeggio. > > I personally

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-04 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
On Sun 03 Oct 2010, 14:52 Graham Percival wrote: > On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:37:59PM +0100, James Lowe wrote: > > > 1. Open Email > > 2. Read Email. Spot problem. Reply > > Yes. mutt! all-in-one, whether example is attached or inline =O] ((2Graham: i know you know,)) > > If someone sends an ly

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-04 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > I greatly prefer having short snippets inline.  That way I can read them in > my mail reader, rather than having to open them to see what's up. Ditto. If I ever want to compile one, I have a dedicated ~/toto.ly file that I only use for pastin

Re: Snippets in mailinglist (Was: Re: bad cross-staff slurs)

2010-10-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 09:21:49AM +0300, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: > On Sun 03 Oct 2010, 14:52 Graham Percival wrote: > > 2b. if you can't spot the problem, point them at > > http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html > This is rather for bug-lilypond, i'd say. In lilypond-user it is customary to > sen