Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-21 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Nick Urbanik wrote: Come to think of it, the compat libs package was for a homebrew version of ESP GS 8.15rc[1-3]; I think the Rawhide packages obviate it. Not quite: $ sudo rpm -Uhv ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.i386.rpm lilypond-2.7.24-1.i386.rpm ghostscript-devel-8.15.1-3.1.i386.rpm error:

Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-20 Thread Nick Urbanik
Dear Folks, I want to install Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. I am so grateful for the effort that you folks have put into it. Unfortunately I cannot install it, since an appropriate ghostscript-devel seems to be unavailable, and a number of other things I need depend on that, including

Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-20 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Nick Urbanik wrote: Dear Folks, I want to install Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. I am so grateful for the effort that you folks have put into it. Unfortunately I cannot install it, since an appropriate ghostscript-devel seems to be unavailable, and a number of other things I need depend on that,

Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-20 Thread Nick Urbanik
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:41:15AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Nick Urbanik wrote: Dear Folks, I want to install Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. I am so grateful for the effort that you folks have put into it. Unfortunately I cannot install it, since an appropriate ghostscript-devel

Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-20 Thread Nick Urbanik
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:21:50AM +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:41:15AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Nick Urbanik wrote: Dear Folks, I want to install Lilypond on Fedora Core 4. I am so grateful for the effort that you folks have put into it.

Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-20 Thread Nick Urbanik
Dear Folks, On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:45:02AM +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote: On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:21:50AM +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:41:15AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Nick Urbanik wrote: Dear Folks, [snip] Are the *.src.rpm files available?

Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-20 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Nick Urbanik wrote: Okay, ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.src.rpm is available from rawhide; have built it okay. It's a bit alarming that Red Hat didn't sign the file. Now the next question: is ghostscript-libs-7.07-41.i386.rpm made from a hacked up ghostscript-7.07-41.src.rpm from Fedora Core 4

Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-20 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Nick Urbanik wrote: $ sudo rpm -Uhv ghostscript-*8.15.1-3.1.i386.rpm ghostscript-compat-libs-7.07-41.1nu.i386.rpm Password: error: Failed dependencies: libijs.so is needed by (installed) gimp-print-4.2.7-7.i386 So what am I doing wrong? Come to think of it, the compat libs package

Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-20 Thread Nick Urbanik
Dear Han-Wen, On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:21:46AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Nick Urbanik wrote: Okay, ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.src.rpm is available from rawhide; have built it okay. It's a bit alarming that Red Hat didn't sign the file. Now the next question: is

Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?

2005-12-20 Thread Nick Urbanik
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:23:59AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Nick Urbanik wrote: $ sudo rpm -Uhv ghostscript-*8.15.1-3.1.i386.rpm ghostscript-compat-libs-7.07-41.1nu.i386.rpm Password: error: Failed dependencies: libijs.so is needed by (installed) gimp-print-4.2.7-7.i386