Re: Note spacing issue with accidental

Hi Dan, It may or may not be appropriate for your needs, but you could consider using proportional spacing. Add something like this and you obtain a much more nicely controlled appearance. == snip \layout { \context { \Score proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment

Re: Note spacing issue with accidental

> On May 11, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Knute Snortum wrote: > > I think you have to move the accidental to get the note to move. I don't > really like the way the following looks, but at least it's an example of > moving the accidental: > > rightTwo = \relative c' { > c4

Re: Note spacing issue with accidental

I think you have to move the accidental to get the note to move. I don't really like the way the following looks, but at least it's an example of moving the accidental: rightTwo = \relative c' { c4 \tuplet 3/2 { d4 \tweak Accidental.Y-offset -0.25 cis8 } } --- Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On

Note spacing issue with accidental

In the code below, the last eighth note in voice two of both the right and left hand are too far to the right (even slightly more so in the piece from which this excerpt is taken, shown in the attached image). I’ve fiddled with various values using \once \override NoteColumn.force-hshift and

Re: Spacing issue with accidental

2008/12/11 Stefan Waler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I attach a sample script, please note the accidentials for 'ces' in the second and for 'fes' in the forth bar. I tried to simplify the score very much, but it seems as lilypond continues to calculate wrong spaces for every further accidental of this

Re: Spacing issue with accidental

It seems that the accidentals that are not printed in the new measure because of the tie, are not removed completely, but just made invisible still taking space. /Mats Valentin Villenave wrote: 2008/12/11 Stefan Waler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I attach a sample script, please note the

Re: Spacing issue with accidental

Thanks for the analysis! Do you think there is any workaround? Any chance to get this fixed in 2.11? Stefan Mats Bengtsson wrote: It seems that the accidentals that are not printed in the new measure because of the tie, are not removed completely, but just made invisible still taking space.

Re: Spacing issue with accidental

2008/12/11 Stefan Waler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Do you think there is any workaround? There's a workaround mentioned here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=612 Regards, Neil ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Spacing issue with accidental

2008/12/11 Neil Puttock n.putt...@gmail.com: There's a workaround mentioned here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=612 Oh, I thought this one looked familiar but i couldn't find it. Thanks Neil! Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user