Hi Aaron,
(There's a >> missing.)
Well, either you or your email client erroneously stripped the ">>"
from the original email. It did indeed contain ">>".
You're right - Mozilla Thunderbird was the culprit. @Erwinstein: I'm
sorry, no mistake on your part! (I actually did ponder whether it'
On 2019-03-31 6:07 am, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Am 31.03.19 um 14:43 schrieb Erwinstein:
Forgive me for sending multiple messages but the code snippet in my
previous
message didn't make it in the email. Sorry, I used the raw tag in the
nabble
forum and it was stripped in the email sent to the
Am 31.03.19 um 14:43 schrieb Erwinstein:
Forgive me for sending multiple messages but the code snippet in my previous
message didn't make it in the email. Sorry, I used the raw tag in the nabble
forum and it was stripped in the email sent to the mailing list. Sorry for
not knowing that will happe
Forgive me for sending multiple messages but the code snippet in my previous
message didn't make it in the email. Sorry, I used the raw tag in the nabble
forum and it was stripped in the email sent to the mailing list. Sorry for
not knowing that will happen.
By the way, here is the code of that me
to ask about it.
This is the part that I am trying to replicate.
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t5816/Annotation_2019-02-25_155321.jpg>
Here it is in Lilypond code without the "staff change line" or whatever that
line was actually called (just the notes):
So now