Francisco Vila writes:
> 2012/3/10 David Kastrup :
>>> I tend to agree, but cannot resist to mention that your claim is
>>> incorrect. It's not clearly noted on all download-page (some don't
>>> even mention 10.4 as the lowest supported version). The remark is
>>> missing afaics on the pages in C
Am 10.03.2012 um 11:22 schrieb Colin Hall:
>> I'm not top posting.
>
> Tim McNamara bitstream.net> writes:
>>
>> 2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on
>> my
> MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8.
>>
>
> Thanks for the report, Tim. I also heard from James W
2012/3/10 David Kastrup :
>> I tend to agree, but cannot resist to mention that your claim is
>> incorrect. It's not clearly noted on all download-page (some don't
>> even mention 10.4 as the lowest supported version). The remark is
>> missing afaics on the pages in Czech (cs), Hungarian (hu), Japa
Hans Aikema writes:
> On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>>> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
>>> 2.14.2.
>> I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page
>> clearly says "MacOS
Hello again,
On 10 March 2012 10:38, Hans Aikema wrote:
> On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>>>
>>> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
>>> 2.14.2.
>>
>> I'd use different terminology. The lil
hello,
On 10 March 2012 10:38, Hans Aikema wrote:
> On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>>>
>>> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
>>> 2.14.2.
>>
>> I'd use different terminology. The lilypond
On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
2.14.2.
I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page
clearly says "MacOS X 10.7 Lion is not yet supported.".
> I'm not top posting.
Tim McNamara bitstream.net> writes:
>
> 2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on
> my
MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8.
>
Thanks for the report, Tim. I also heard from James Worlton. Updated status
below.
In this table below "ok" mea
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 03:00:33PM +, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
> 2.14.2.
I'd use different terminology. The lilypond osx download page
clearly says "MacOS X 10.7 Lion is not yet supported.". As such,
any failure to run on 10.7 i
2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on my
MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
There is a known critical issue with Lilypond for MacOS X version
2.14.2.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2338
The symptoms are that double-clicking the Lilypond icon results in a
crash report from MacOS X.
This issue has been fixed in the development stream and a recent
11 matches
Mail list logo