\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\omit StringNumber
}
}
Or, even shorter:
\layout {
\omit Staff.StringNumber
}
I do not know if this is completely equivalent,
It isn't. It omits the StringNumber for _all_ contexts that can be
addressed as "Staff" from inside, including
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
>> Of course you can
>> also do so in the whole score by specifying
>>
>> \layout {
>>\context {
>> \Staff
>> \omit StringNumber
>>}
>> }
>
> Or, even shorter:
>
> \layout {
> \omit Staff.StringNumber
> }
>
> I do not know if this is completely
Of course you can
also do so in the whole score by specifying
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\omit StringNumber
}
}
Or, even shorter:
\layout {
\omit Staff.StringNumber
}
I do not know if this is completely equivalent, but lately I find myself
writing \layout { \context {
tes:
>
> > I am producing a "learning" guitar score with both standard musical
> > notation and tablature on adjacent staves. I wish to hide the output of
> > the string numbers on the standard notation staff, and have this working
> > for single-voice passage
Hello David,
Yes, you’re right. I tested it and it did not work. Now I tested it again, and
it did work. Maybe I’m just getting incompetent. Or too tired. Don’t know.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Valentin Petzel writes:
> Sorry, it’s \with { \override Staff.StringNumber.stencil = ##f } ...
No, it isn't.
--
David Kastrup
Dave Trombley writes:
> I am producing a "learning" guitar score with both standard musical
> notation and tablature on adjacent staves. I wish to hide the output of
> the string numbers on the standard notation staff, and have this working
> for single-voice pas
Sorry, it’s \with { \override Staff.StringNumber.stencil = ##f } ...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
} someMusic
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Freitag, 15. Oktober 2021, 01:10:55 CEST schrieb Dave Trombley:
> I am producing a "learning" guitar score with both standard musical
> notation and tablature on adjacent staves. I wish to hide the output of
> the string numbers on the standard notat
I am producing a "learning" guitar score with both standard musical
notation and tablature on adjacent staves. I wish to hide the output of
the string numbers on the standard notation staff, and have this working
for single-voice passage by using the code
\override Voice.St
Il giorno mer 3 apr 2019 alle 0:30, Stig Brautaset
ha scritto:
I've got this score:
\version "2.19.82"
\new TabStaff { q }
It results in the following tab, which is not what I want:
:---
:To-
:A--4---
:B--4-4-
:---2-2-
:---
Is there any way to retain the fingering from
I've got this score:
\version "2.19.82"
\new TabStaff { q }
It results in the following tab, which is not what I want:
q4.pdf
Description: weird tab
:---
:To-
:A--4---
:B--4-4-
:---2-2-
:---
Is there any way to retain the fingering from the full chord when using
the `q` chord
Thanks, works nice!
Am 22.09.2017 um 17:06 schrieb David Kastrup:
> bb <bb-543...@telecolumbus.net> writes:
>
>> I want to restrain/omit string numbers in the score. But I need them to
>> define because of the guitar tabs. How can I do that?
>>
>> I was l
Thanks, works nice!
Am 22.09.2017 um 17:07 schrieb Marc Hohl:
> \new Staff \with { \omit StringNumber } { ... your music }
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am 22.09.2017 4:51 nachm. schrieb bb <bb-543...@telecolumbus.net>:I want to restrain/omit string numbers in the score. But I need them to
define because of the guitar tabs. How can I do that?
\new Staff \with { \omit StringNumber } { ... your
Am 22.09.2017 um 16:51 schrieb bb:
I want to restrain/omit string numbers in the score. But I need them to
define because of the guitar tabs. How can I do that?
I was looking in the lilypond-user Archives for restrain/omit/avoid/no
string numbers but found no hit.
Regards BB
\omit
bb <bb-543...@telecolumbus.net> writes:
> I want to restrain/omit string numbers in the score. But I need them to
> define because of the guitar tabs. How can I do that?
>
> I was looking in the lilypond-user Archives for restrain/omit/avoid/no
> string numbers but found
I want to restrain/omit string numbers in the score. But I need them to
define because of the guitar tabs. How can I do that?
I was looking in the lilypond-user Archives for restrain/omit/avoid/no
string numbers but found no hit.
Regards BB
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:25:07 -0500
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Thank you so much for your answer to my question re: string
letters instead of numbers. I have seen ringed letters in violin
music as well as in the guitar music of Villa Lobos. I don't think
HVL made it
in the
documentation, it has an example of using \mark II to mark string numbers
on a violin score. While not only clunsier than being able to take
advantage of the \2 string notation, it also didn't work for me because I
am writing for mandolin not violin, and have a parallel tab staff. The
built
there is no built in way to do it. At one point in the
documentation, it has an example of using \mark II to mark string numbers
on a violin score. While not only clunsier than being able to take
advantage of the \2 string notation, it also didn't work for me because I
am writing for mandolin
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
default numbering format for string numbers
(default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
numerals instead.
An example would be something like this:
{ e''\2 } which is an e played on the second
string. The default shows a circled 2
Hi Philip
2014-06-30 21:32 GMT+02:00 philip philip.el...@gmail.com:
I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
default numbering format for string numbers
(default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
numerals instead.
An example would be something like this:
{ e''\2 } which
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:32 PM, philip philip.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
default numbering format for string numbers
(default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
numerals instead.
Try this:
\version 2.19.8
#(define
On 01/07/14 05:32, philip wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
default numbering format for string numbers
(default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
numerals instead.
An example would be something like this:
{ e''\2 } which is an e played on the second
string
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:32:44 + (UTC)
philip philip.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
default numbering format for string numbers
(default is circled arabic numbers) and use roman
numerals instead.
An example would be something like
Roman numerals are very much the convention for string indications for the
violin family.
On 07:13, Tue 01 Jul 2014, Nick Payne wrote:
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 07:13:47 +1000
From: Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net
Subject: Re: string numbers (fingering instructions) as roman numerals
2014-06-30 22:25 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:32 PM, philip philip.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knows how to override the
default numbering format for string numbers
(default is circled arabic numbers) and use
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, David Raleigh Arnold d...@openguitar.com
wrote:
How do I indicate strings by letter-pitch instead of
numbers, the way Villa Lobos did? Regards, Rale
You could do something like the following:
\version 2.19.8
#(define strings EBGDAE)
#(define
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't need any circle you can write (including David's code) :
{
\override StringNumber.text = #string-number::calc-roman-text
\override StringNumber.stencil =
Hi Patrick,
LP automatically calculates the fret numbers (AFAIK) within
a range of 4 frets.
Ah! that explains a lot of strange (to me) behaviour and warning messages I
was getting when defining string numbers in chords for standard notation and
tab. I see the sense in it, but surely open
Hi Carl,
Perhaps if tab string numbers were assigned as documented...
...By default pitches are assigned to the lowest playing position on the
fret-board (first position). Open strings are automatically preferred.
Tab string numbers for a given position being defined
On 7/26/10 6:41 AM, Phil Burfitt phil.burf...@talktalk.net wrote:
Hi Carl,
Perhaps if tab string numbers were assigned as documented...
...By default pitches are assigned to the lowest playing position on the
fret-board (first position). Open strings are automatically preferred
Ciao Federico,
Thanks, I've since found that using TabStaff.minimumFret helps reduce the
need to define string numbers. I've also discovered some unexpected
behaviour in the tab string numbering (though this may be because I'm using
developmental version 2.13.17). It seems that its neccessary
Hi Phil,
Am 24.07.2010 um 12:31 schrieb Phil Burfitt:
Ciao Federico,
Thanks, I've since found that using TabStaff.minimumFret helps
reduce the need to define string numbers.
Yes, it's a very useful feature! The advantage is that you could also
define some string numbers to show up
On 7/24/10 5:13 AM, Patrick Schmidt p.l.schm...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Phil,
Am 24.07.2010 um 12:31 schrieb Phil Burfitt:
Ciao Federico,
Thanks, I've since found that using TabStaff.minimumFret helps
reduce the need to define string numbers.
Yes, it's a very useful feature! The advantage
Il giorno gio, 22/07/2010 alle 17.24 +0100, Phil Burfitt ha scritto:
Hello List,
How can I define the string numbers of the notes of a chord in guitar TAB
without the string numbers appearing in the standard notation?
ie. string numbers for tab notation can be defined b\3 or b\3
Hello List,
How can I define the string numbers of the notes of a chord in guitar TAB
without the string numbers appearing in the standard notation?
ie. string numbers for tab notation can be defined b\3 or b\3 and string
numbers for tab and standard notation can be defined b\3 but when I
Hello again!
I'm once again posting with a newbie question.
I'm trying to make a score with both music and tab staffs, as well as chord
names a fret diagrams. But NOT string numbers in circles.
Can anyone suggest the proper thing to set? Is it an override?
My Score section looks like
Grateful Frog wrote:
Hello again!
I'm once again posting with a newbie question.
I'm trying to make a score with both music and tab staffs, as well as chord
names a fret diagrams. But NOT string numbers in circles.
Can anyone suggest the proper thing to set? Is it an override?
My Score
Thanks! That did it perfectly!
GF
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.comwrote:
Grateful Frog wrote:
Hello again!
I'm trying to make a score with both music and tab staffs, as well as
chord
names a fret diagrams. But NOT string numbers in circles.
You can
Grateful Frog wrote:
Thanks! That did it perfectly!
GF
Glad to help, but beware that transparent objects still take up space so
if later you have layout problems with respect to fingerings and other
things, it could have to do with the transparent string numbers. Best,
Jon
--
Jonathan
with the transparent string numbers. Best,
Jon
A better override would be to
\override StringNumber #'stencil = ##f
which eliminates the printing of StringNumbers in the music staff.
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hello,
I have the opposit problem. Lilypond will put string numbers on notes in
chords. But I dont want them. How can I suppress them in this example?
\version 2.11.32
melody = \relative c'' {
\key d \major
\time 4/4
\voiceOne
b8 d,, b' g a\4 cis\3 e\2 a a' e\2 cis\3 |
}
bass = \relative c
Got it!
LilyPond will happily put string numbers on notes which are part of a
chord, but doesn't think it's worth while doing for single strings.
But when you get into the more arcane areas of arranging for plectrum-
played instruments, it can actually make a difference to have
fingering
Hi Julian,
On 9/3/07, Julian Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got it!
LilyPond will happily put string numbers on notes which are part of a
chord, but doesn't think it's worth while doing for single strings.
But when you get into the more arcane areas of arranging for plectrum-
played
Hi Julian,
On 9/3/07, Julian Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. It didn't like that at all!
It works fine for me:
\version 2.10.29
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
{
c'\1 c'\2
}
On an unrelated note, when you reply you need to cc lilypond-user, otherwise
your replies won't show up on
them as text
\once \override TextScript #'staff-padding = #3.0
b4^2 e a2-3
But the numbers are twice as large as default string numbers.
However, when I try changing variables on my own nothing works.
This is one of my numerous failures
\once \override StringNumberOrientations
*8
And this works for string number spacing if I enter them as text
\once \override TextScript #'staff-padding = #3.0
b4^2 e a2-3
But the numbers are twice as large as default string numbers.
However, when I try changing variables on my own nothing works.
This is one of my numerous failures
Hi
Following the description in the snippet tablature.ly in the regressiion
tests of Lilypond 2.10.0 I would expect string numbers in all the 4 chords!
Am I mistaken?
Thanks
Luc
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http
To just move things vertically, it is in general a better idea
to use the property called padding, see the section on
Common Tweaks in the manual.
/Mats
VSD wrote:
use the extra-offset property of the StringNumber object, it allows to
move it both vertically and horizontally. e.g:
use the extra-offset property of the StringNumber object, it allows to
move it both vertically and horizontally. e.g:
%%%
\version 2.6.0
\score {
{
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(up)
\set stringNumberOrientations = #'(down)
\set Staff.instrument = C Major
\clef treble
Greetings,
I just started to use Lilypond today and I have run into a problem (surprise). To start learning, I started to enter some scales. I have been able to solve most of my problems except how to shift a string number (Guitar notation). Below is what I have done:
Walter,
The suggestion
a2^\markup {$\\!\\!$\\textbf{\\textcircled{\\small{1
gives me just the circle, with no number on my 2.4.2 (cygwin) also, but if I
add $'s around the number, as below, it works OK.
a2^\markup {$\\!\\!$\\textbf{\\textcircled{\\small{$1$
Warren
On 2/7/05 8:16 PM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7-Feb-05, at 4:15 PM, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
On 2/7/05 5:14 PM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have lily 2.4.2 installed, right? From the fink package?
It did not work. I got the circle above the note but
I'd suspect your TeX installation. First of all, if you run lilypond
with the flag 'lilypond --verbose myfile.ly', you should get much
more information printed out that might help to sort out the problems.
Another test you could try is to save the following lines in a file
called tinytest.tex:
On 2/8/05 10:07 AM, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd suspect your TeX installation. First of all, if you run lilypond
with the flag 'lilypond --verbose myfile.ly', you should get much
more information printed out that might help to sort out the problems.
Another test you could
Did the resulting file tinytest.ps contain the number or not?
If it did, then the I have no more ideas unless you send also
the output of lilypond --verbose thefile.ly
/Mats
Walter Hofmeister wrote:
On 2/8/05 10:07 AM, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd suspect your TeX installation.
On 8-Feb-05, at 7:31 AM, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
I updated to 2.4.2-2 and it made no difference. I have a lot of
packages
installed and issuing an update all command could take days to
perform. Do
you have any ideas which package(s) might be responsible? Might it be a
configuration problem?
You don't say what platform you use. If you run the Cygwin version
in Windows, it might help to rerun setup.exe and add the packages
tetex-base and tetex-extra.
/Mats
Walter Hofmeister wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to achieve numbers in circles? I used to be able to
get this to work on 2.1.x:
Mats Bengtsson kirjoitti:
You don't say what platform you use. If you run the Cygwin version
in Windows, it might help to rerun setup.exe and add the packages
tetex-base and tetex-extra.
/Mats
Walter Hofmeister wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to achieve numbers in circles? I used to be
able to
On 2/7/05 5:51 AM, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't say what platform you use. If you run the Cygwin version
in Windows, it might help to rerun setup.exe and add the packages
tetex-base and tetex-extra.
/Mats
Walter Hofmeister wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to
This is one of the font files that should be generated automatically
as soon as you need it, if you have a normal installation of teTeX.
Occasionally, it helps to do run the command tex testfont and
input the following:
Name of the font to test = ecrm0500
Now type a test command (\help for help):)
On 7-Feb-05, at 7:12 AM, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
I'm on Mac OS X. I'm using Fink and there appears to be no
tetex-extra.
Here is a list of the packages that are available:
You have lily 2.4.2 installed, right? From the fink package?
Try this:
\version 2.4.2
\layout{raggedright=##t}
{
On 2/7/05 5:14 PM, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7-Feb-05, at 7:12 AM, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
I'm on Mac OS X. I'm using Fink and there appears to be no
tetex-extra.
Here is a list of the packages that are available:
You have lily 2.4.2 installed, right? From the
On 2/7/05 6:18 PM, David Raleigh Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 06 February 2005 10:15 pm, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
ces^\markup {\\textcircled{\\tiny 1}}
It's hard to keep up. This works for 2.4.2:
\version 2.4.2
\score { \new Staff {
a'
b'
ces'^\markup
On Sunday 06 February 2005 10:15 pm, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
ces^\markup {\\textcircled{\\tiny 1}}
It's hard to keep up. This works for 2.4.2:
\version 2.4.2
\score { \new Staff {
a'
b'
ces'^\markup {$\\!\\!$\\textbf{\\textcircled{\\small{1}}}\\dots}
ces'^\markup
Can anyone tell me how to achieve numbers in circles? I used to be able to
get this to work on 2.1.x:
ces^\markup {\\textcircled{\\tiny 1}}
I think I got this from David Raleigh Arnold in a previous post. It no
longer works under 2.4.2. It gives the circle but no number inside of it.
I ran an
Can anyone tell me how to achieve numbers in circles? I used to be
able to get this to work on 2.1.x: ces^\markup {\\textcircled{\\tiny
1}}
Hi Walter,
just tested: works for me on 2.4.2 cygwin. Strange!
Thomas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On Wednesday 31 March 2004 07:58, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
No! First of all, \center-align only works within a single markup
and makes sure that if you have several lines in your markup,
these will be aligned to each other.
This works for some reason, with one line in the markup:
Use the mailing list archives for lilypond-user
(see http://lilypond.org/web/about/) and search for
circled string numbers!
/Mats
Lyle Raymond wrote:
Sorry to bother you guys about this a second time, but the first answer I got
didn't seem to work.
In LP 2.1.0, how does one indicate circled
Sorry to bother you guys about this a second time, but the first answer I got
didn't seem to work.
In LP 2.1.0, how does one indicate circled string numbers above the notes? Is
there simply a way to encircle markup text? Or is there a specific command
On Monday 13 October 2003 02:33 pm, Walter Hofmeister wrote:
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have small numbers in
circles? I am trying to notate some guitar music where it is required
to play a note in an alternate location on another string. I would
like to have a left hand finger
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have small numbers in circles? I am
trying to notate some guitar music where it is required to play a note in an
alternate location on another string. I would like to have a left hand
finger number above the note head, and a string indication (small number
74 matches
Mail list logo
