Re: Syntactic synonyms, or no?

2006-01-11 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Erik Sandberg wrote: Also, there are some limitations with the \with construct (for example, \consists bugreport please. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Syntactic synonyms, or no?

2006-01-11 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 14.20, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Erik Sandberg wrote: Also, there are some limitations with the \with construct (for example, \consists bugreport please. sorry, I remembered incorrectly (it is \accepts that doesn't work inside \with, see with-accepts.ly in bug

Re: Syntactic synonyms, or no?

2005-12-30 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Trevor Bača wrote: Is ... \new Score { - music - \layout { \context { \Score \override Foo #'bar = #value } } } ... exactly equivalent to ... \new Score \with { \override Foo #'bar = #value } { - music - } yes. ... or is there a

Re: Syntactic synonyms, or no?

2005-12-30 Thread Trevor Bača
On 12/30/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trevor Bača wrote: Is ... \new Score { - music - \layout { \context { \Score \override Foo #'bar = #value } } } ... exactly equivalent to ... \new Score \with {

Syntactic synonyms, or no?

2005-12-29 Thread Trevor Bača
Is ... \new Score { - music - \layout { \context { \Score \override Foo #'bar = #value } } } ... exactly equivalent to ... \new Score \with { \override Foo #'bar = #value } { - music - } ... or is there a reason to prefer one to the