Andrew Bernard writes:
>> On 25 May 2018 at 01:21, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This is stupid but
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks very much. This is exactly what is needed. It was the
> collapse-height concept that I was missing.
>
> This works well. Can you explain in what respect you designate th
Hi David,
Thanks very much. This is exactly what is needed. It was the
collapse-height concept that I was missing.
This works well. Can you explain in what respect you designate this as
stupid? It's certainly non-standard practice, but I find it is better to
accede to these requests from my colle
David Kastrup writes:
> Andrew Bernard writes:
>
>> I am attempting to make MS paper for a colleague who idiosyncratically
>> uses a thick bar at the left on single staves. This is simple for a
>> staff group, but how does one do it for a single ungrouped set of
>> staves? Refer to attached sket
Andrew Bernard writes:
> I am attempting to make MS paper for a colleague who idiosyncratically
> uses a thick bar at the left on single staves. This is simple for a
> staff group, but how does one do it for a single ungrouped set of
> staves? Refer to attached sketch.
This is stupid but
\new S
I am attempting to make MS paper for a colleague who idiosyncratically uses
a thick bar at the left on single staves. This is simple for a staff group,
but how does one do it for a single ungrouped set of staves? Refer to
attached sketch.
Andrew
___
lily
