On Monday 06 June 2005 03.34, Ed Baskerville wrote:
> Thanks for the quick fix--the barline thickness is now consistent.
> However, now all the barlines look too thick--it's quite noticeable
> when comparing with professional printed scores as well as previous
> versions of Lily.
Is this also true
Thanks for the quick fix--the barline thickness is now consistent.
However, now all the barlines look too thick--it's quite noticeable
when comparing with professional printed scores as well as previous
versions of Lily.
I also sent an email to bug-lilypond.
--Ed
On May 29, 2005, at 6:03
Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
hi ed, han-wen,
i mentioned this today as well, and have seen it since approx. 2.5.18
or so. stan sanderson also mentioned it in an email from 12.04.2005
with the subject "2.5.18 bar line thickness error(?)"
what stan and i have in common is macos 10.3.x.
ed: are you
> hi ed, han-wen,
>
> i mentioned this today as well, and have seen it since approx. 2.5.18
> or so. stan sanderson also mentioned it in an email from 12.04.2005
> with the subject "2.5.18 bar line thickness error(?)"
>
> what stan and i have in common is macos 10.3.x.
>
> ed: are you also on a
hi ed, han-wen,
i mentioned this today as well, and have seen it since approx. 2.5.18
or so.
stan sanderson also mentioned it in an email from 12.04.2005 with the
subject "2.5.18 bar line thickness error(?)"
what stan and i have in common is macos 10.3.x.
ed: are you also on a mac?
is this m
I'm on Tiger (10.4.1). So, yeah, could be a problem with Apple's PDF
rendering?
As I zoom in farther and farther it's less and less noticeable. It
almost looks as if the edges of the line between the staves is being
fuzzed ("antialiased", though there's no real possibility of
aliasing) an
hi ed, han-wen,
i mentioned this today as well, and have seen it since approx. 2.5.18
or so.
stan sanderson also mentioned it in an email from 12.04.2005 with the
subject "2.5.18 bar line thickness error(?)"
what stan and i have in common is macos 10.3.x.
ed: are you also on a mac?
is this m
Ed Baskerville wrote:
Hi all,
In all the examples for 2.5.26, the barline connection between staves
is thicker than the barline within the staff. Is this a known problem
that's being addressed? Should I just hold out for 2.6 final?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.x
Ed Baskerville wrote:
Hi all,
In all the examples for 2.5.26, the barline connection between staves
is thicker than the barline within the staff. Is this a known problem
that's being addressed? Should I just hold out for 2.6 final?
Bugreport please. Note your PDF viewer may decide to ren
Hi all,
In all the examples for 2.5.26, the barline connection between staves
is thicker than the barline within the staff. Is this a known problem
that's being addressed? Should I just hold out for 2.6 final?
--Ed
___
lilypond-user mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo
