Hallo list,
I'd like the second note in voice one to share the notehead with the
last one in voice two. This is quite common in 19th century guitar music.
Thank you,
Thomas
--
\version "2.19.3"
{
\relative c'' {
\time2/8
<<
{
c8..[ c32]
}
\\
{
\tuplet 3/2 8 {
c,16 e g
Thomas Scharkowski writes:
> Hallo list,
>
> I'd like the second note in voice one to share the notehead with the
> last one in voice two. This is quite common in 19th century guitar
> music.
> Thank you,
> Thomas
>
> \version "2.19.3"
> {
> \relative c'' {
> \time2/8
> <<
> {
> c8..[
Hi Thomas,
if I understand you correctly, you want the two voices to share a
notehead -- even when they are not simultaneous? Interesting.
Here's one possibility, scaling the durations in the upper voice to fit:
{
\relative c'' {
\time2/8
<<
{
c8..*20/21 [ c32*4/3]
}
\\
{
\t
Well, the durations of the first voice then simply are _wrong_. If you
want them to merge with the second voice, you need to scale them to
fit. I've not put this into shortest terms so that one can still figure
out that the scales come from a mismatch of a 5/6 to 7/8 division and
1/6 to 1/8.
..
Hi Fredrik,
if I understand you correctly, you want the two voices to share a
notehead -- even when they are not simultaneous? Interesting.
Yes, it is.
:-)
It was common notation practice in italian baroque style, not to notate
a tuplet consisting of a quarter and an eighth note like we
Original-Nachricht
..
Hi Fredrik,
if I understand you correctly, you want the two voices to share a
notehead -- even when they are not simultaneous? Interesting.
Yes, it is.
:-)
It was common notation practice in italian baroque style, not to notate
a tuplet consisting
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 12:38 +0100, Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
>
> > ..
> Hi Fredrik,
> >
> > if I understand you correctly, you want the two voices to share a
> > notehead -- even when they are not simultaneous? Interesting.
>
> Yes, it is.
> :-)
>
> It was common notation practice in italian bar
