Re: Unexpected behaviour of script-stencil-hack

2014-10-15 2:15 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik : > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Thomas Morley > wrote: >> >> >> Why does this happen? X-offset is _never_ called in the body! > > > But doing this: > > #(let ((message (display "boo!\n"))) '()) Ah, great example! > shows that what you're binding

Re: Unexpected behaviour of script-stencil-hack

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > > Why does this happen? X-offset is _never_ called in the body! > But doing this: #(let ((message (display "boo!\n"))) '()) shows that what you're binding message to is evaluated. --David ___ l

Re: Unexpected behaviour of script-stencil-hack

Hi Harm, On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi David, > > 2014-10-15 0:54 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik : > > Hi Harm, > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Thomas Morley > > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> consider the following code. > >> > >> > >> > >> \version "2.1

Re: Unexpected behaviour of script-stencil-hack

Hi David, 2014-10-15 0:54 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik : > Hi Harm, > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Thomas Morley > wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> consider the following code. >> >> >> >> \version "2.19.13" >> %\version "2.16.0" >> >> add-to-script = >> #(define-event-function (parser location mrk

Re: Unexpected behaviour of script-stencil-hack

Hi Harm, On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi folks, > > consider the following code. > > > > \version "2.19.13" > %\version "2.16.0" > > add-to-script = > #(define-event-function (parser location mrkp music)(markup? ly:music?) > #{ > \tweak #'stencil > #(lambda

Unexpected behaviour of script-stencil-hack

Hi folks, consider the following code. \version "2.19.13" %\version "2.16.0" add-to-script = #(define-event-function (parser location mrkp music)(markup? ly:music?) #{ \tweak #'stencil #(lambda (grob) (let ( ;(X-offset (ly:grob-property grob 'X-offset))