Thanks! This is a great suggestion! I'll try it.
Mark
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:13 PM, James Worlton wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Mark Mathias wrote:
>
> Finally, since 2.14, LilyPondTool no longer works as it did and I haven't
>> seen anything from Mr. Fodor about it for several mont
On Feb 20, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Mark Mathias wrote:
Finally, since 2.14, LilyPondTool no longer works as it did and I
haven't seen anything from Mr. Fodor about it for several months.
Did I miss something? Is there a better way to work on a Lilypond
file than jEdit with LilyPondTool?
I wa
On Feb 20, 2012, at 7:11 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Mark Mathias writes:
>
>> Recently, I've spoken enthusiastically about Lilypond, not just to my
>> students, but to anyone who will listen. So far, I've had no takers.
>> Any thoughts on ways to get others interested in Lilypond would be
>> we
Mark Mathias writes:
> Recently, I've spoken enthusiastically about Lilypond, not just to my
> students, but to anyone who will listen. So far, I've had no takers.
> Any thoughts on ways to get others interested in Lilypond would be
> welcome.
The interview with Mike in the last LilyPond report?
Mark Mathias writes:
> I appreciate Xavier's suggestion that I move to 2.15. I have not used
> development versions of Lilypond because of the warning, "If you have
> the slightest doubt..." Well, as a non-programmer with a great deal to
> learn, I have a lot of doubt! :-) I notice that 2.16 is c
sted in helping.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Mark Mathias
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 3:40 PM
Subject: Using Development Versions, Introducing LilyPond to Others
I appreciate Xavier's suggestion that I move to 2.15. I have not
I appreciate Xavier's suggestion that I move to 2.15. I have not used
development versions of Lilypond because of the warning, "If you have the
slightest doubt..." Well, as a non-programmer with a great deal to learn, I
have a lot of doubt! :-) I notice that 2.16 is close to release, so I will
take
