Mats Bengtsson wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 1:09 PM
>
>> Using the code below, I get the temporary staves vertically offset, as shown
>> in the attached image. It appears that they are avoiding each others'
>> non-existent horizontal extent. Is there any was of lining them up
>> vertically?
> T
Using the code below, I get the temporary staves vertically offset, as shown
in the attached image. It appears that they are avoiding each others'
non-existent horizontal extent. Is there any was of lining them up
vertically?
This is an old (well, less than 10 years, but still) favorite bug, see
Phil, you wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 10:39 AM
> I can't easily use stopStaff, etc., because the temporary staves are
> autogenerated in my real life application. How would I keep the context
> alive otherwise?
By using spacer rests, but you'd still need to stop and start the staff to
rem
- Original Message -
From: "Trevor Daniels"
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "LilyPond User Group"
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: Vertical positioning of temporary staves
Phil, you wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:59 AM
Using the code bel
Phil, you wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 9:59 AM
> Using the code below, I get the temporary staves vertically offset, as shown
> in the attached image. It appears that they are avoiding each others'
> non-existent horizontal extent. Is there any was of lining them up
> vertically?
Only by keepi
Using the code below, I get the temporary staves vertically offset, as shown
in the attached image. It appears that they are avoiding each others'
non-existent horizontal extent. Is there any was of lining them up
vertically?
\new Staff = "Permanent"
\relative c'' {
c c c c
<<
{
c c c c
}
\new Sta
