On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 8:04 AM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
>
> > Le 16/04/2022 16:55, Knute Snortum a écrit :
> >
> >
> > I have run into a LilyPond issue [1] where the accidental spacing is
> > wrong when there is a tie to the next measure. This is my tiny
> Le 16/04/2022 16:55, Knute Snortum a écrit :
>
>
> I have run into a LilyPond issue [1] where the accidental spacing is
> wrong when there is a tie to the next measure. This is my tiny
> example (and there's a good one in the issue, too):
>
> %%%
> \vers
I have run into a LilyPond issue [1] where the accidental spacing is
wrong when there is a tie to the next measure. This is my tiny
example (and there's a good one in the issue, too):
%%%
\version "2.22.2"
\relative {
\clef bass
s2. gis4~ | 2
}
%%%
My question: is there a w
d I could better address the issue myself. Sorry XD
- Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/weird-Accidental-spacing-padding-issue-tp204835p204847.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
li
Hi Abraham,
> I hoped it wasn't a font problem.
Me, too. =)
Glad it wasn't.
> Yikes! That's an undesirable set of overrides. Tolerable, but undesirable.
> Would be good to get to the bottom of what's really causing the extra space.
+1
Thanks,
Kieren.
Kieren
Would be good to get to the bottom of what's really causing the extra space.
Best,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/weird-Accidental-spacing-padding-issue-tp204835p204844.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___
Hi Abraham,
> Is there something in another staff that is causing the offset?
No.
> Does this happen when you use Emmentaler for the music font?
Yes. (Aside: Switching back to it to test that reminded me how much I love
Cadence!)
> I looked at the internals section and there is the
e. Not sure when it changed, exactly, but
some time between when the 'parent-alignment-... properties were added and
now.
HTH,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/weird-Accidental-spacing-padding-issu
Hello all,
I've gone back to update an old score, and I'm finding that all the accidentals
seem to have extra padding on the left-hand side, despite the fact that I can't
seem to find any such tweak/override in the chain of files. Here is the default
Lilypond output of a measure:
and here's
Hi Torsten,
- What exactly does this pair of numbers mean? Why are there two
values to specify the width of a graphical object?
From the grob-interface doc page: Each grob has a reference point
(a.k.a. parent): the position of a grob is stored relative to that
reference point.
, the documentation says it is hard coded, but I could actually
change it: it indeed allows for an increased accidental spacing
between accidentals and graphical objects such as bar lines.
I attached two examples that only differ in one line. In
closeSpacing.ly X-extent is explicitly set to its
I'm having trouble making the spacing of accidentals right under the
following circumstance, where there's a note with an accidental tied
across a barline and a note in a voice below it also has an accidental.
The tied note c-sharp doesn't have an accidental because it's tied,
but the
Hi Jon,
2008/12/16 Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
Is there a way to make the invisible sharp symbol take up no space so that
the whole chord moves to the left where it ought to be?
There's a workaround for this mentioned in the bug tracker for issue #612.
Regards,
Neil
Neil Puttock wrote:
Hi Jon,
2008/12/16 Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
Is there a way to make the invisible sharp symbol take up no space so that
the whole chord moves to the left where it ought to be?
There's a workaround for this mentioned in the bug tracker for issue #612.
Hi Jonathan,
This was promising but didn't solve the problem because it also made
the accidentals in the other voice disappear. Here's the context:
Maybe the modified snippet (included below) will solve your problem?
HTH,
Kieren.
%%
\version 2.11.65
\new Staff \relative c'' {
2008/12/17 Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
I still want the a-sharp to appear in the 2nd measure, but don't want the
space occupied by the c-sharp. Using this no-reset workaround, the
a-sharp disappears, too. Is there a way to apply this style using \override
instead of set? if so
Neil Puttock wrote:
2008/12/17 Jonathan Kulp jonlancek...@gmail.com:
I still want the a-sharp to appear in the 2nd measure, but don't want the
space occupied by the c-sharp. Using this no-reset workaround, the
a-sharp disappears, too. Is there a way to apply this style using \override
Hi,
I have a crescendo hairpin stuck between two consecutive notes (as you can
see in the example below)
I tried to use a SeparationItem - padding... without success, even with a
padding of 10 there is ... no effect (here, I tried between two fourth
notes, but wherever I use it, I always have
Please always tell what LilyPond version you use. When I try your
example with version 2.10.0, I certainly
get an added spacing between the two notes.
However, if your main purpose is to get a longer hairpin, why not
follow the instructions in the section on Dynamics
in the manual:
\override
sorry ;p
Lilypond 2.11.13
hairpin minimum-length seems to work perfectly...
thank you again,
your are ... very reliable ^^
Yota
On 1/25/07, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please always tell what LilyPond version you use. When I try your
example with version 2.10.0, I certainly
get
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:35:56 -0400
Kieren Richard MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to be running into a situation where accidentals are not
spacing quite right.
Here is the input:
r fs c'! e! fs c' ef | r f! b e! f b ef
It looks good to me -- if you move the sharp over to be
Hello, Graham:
Does it look very bad to you?
Yes, I find it stands out as looking sloppy.
Here's an example of what I think it *should* look like (untweaked as
engraved by Igor Engraver v1.7):
inline: accidentals.tiff
Note how the top and bottom accidentals align (without touching), and
how
On Sunday 26 October 2003 07:49 am, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote:
Hello, Graham:
Does it look very bad to you?
Yes, I find it stands out as looking sloppy.
Here's an example of what I think it *should* look like (untweaked as
engraved by Igor Engraver v1.7):
I thought chromatic signs
[ Mac OS X 10.2.6; Lilypond 2.0.1 ]
Hello, all:
I seem to be running into a situation where accidentals are not spacing
quite right.
Here is the input:
r fs c'! e! fs c' ef | r f! b e! f b ef
And here is the (untweaked) output:
accidentals.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
My guess is
24 matches
Mail list logo
