Hi Ralph
you wrote Wednesday, February 16, 2011 2:34 PM
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Jan Warchoł
wrote:
I think i have an idea how to explain this bug.
I suppose it happens because LilyPond is not aware that the dot
is in
voiceTwo context (and therefore lower than usual).
compile thi
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Jan Warchoł <
lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/2/12 Trevor Daniels :
> >
> > Jan Warchoł wrote Saturday, February 12, 2011 9:25 AM
> >
> >> I agree too, but in my opinion it's a less important problem than the
> >> one marked in red in the attachmen
2011/2/12 Trevor Daniels :
>
> Jan Warchoł wrote Saturday, February 12, 2011 9:25 AM
>
>> I agree too, but in my opinion it's a less important problem than the
>> one marked in red in the attachment. (However, it was present in
>> 2.12.3 too).
>> The natural on c is perhaps moved because of the dot
Jan Warchoł wrote Saturday, February 12, 2011 9:25 AM
I agree too, but in my opinion it's a less important problem than
the
one marked in red in the attachment. (However, it was present in
2.12.3 too).
The natural on c is perhaps moved because of the dot on f, but i
don't
think it should be
2011/2/10 Trevor Daniels :
>
> Keith OHara wrote Thursday, February 10, 2011 3:19 AM
>> It is looking better now in 2.13.49.
>> This two-bar example contains several difficult music-engraving issues,
>> especially if I include the enharmonic spellings and key cancellation from
>> the original editi
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:36:45 -0800, Trevor Daniels
wrote:
Keith OHara wrote Thursday, February 10, 2011 3:19 AM
It is looking better now in 2.13.49.
This two-bar example contains several difficult music-engraving
issues, especially if I include the enharmonic spellings and key
cancellation f
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
Trevor Daniels
Sent: 10 February 2011 09:37
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; Keith OHara
Subject: Re: alpha test, horizontal spacing
Keith OHara wrote Thursday, February 10, 2011 3:19 AM
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:30:03 +0100 Gerard McConnell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Keith E OHara
wrote:
So I favor less aggressive tucking of noteheads under other
noteheads and
their attached accidentals, if that is an option
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:30:03 +0100 Gerard McConnell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Keith E OHara wrote:
So I favor less aggressive tucking of noteheads under other noteheads and
their attached accidentals, if that is an option. Other opinions?
I agree that in the examples you gave
I agree that in the examples you gave the accidentals look a lot better in
the 2.12 versions.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Keith E OHara wrote:
> In "First impressions of alpha test" I wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:41:24 -0700, Joe Neeman
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Do you consider this desir
10 matches
Mail list logo
