Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-09 Thread David Linn
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 8:22 PM David Wright wrote: > > Some are available through links; just not the ones given in the digest. > I don't know the particulars of your example because I had already > deleted it (not interested in chord mode) by the time I read your

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-06 Thread Tim Reeves
> Message: 9 > Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 11:26:17 -0700 > From: Flaming Hakama by Elaine <ela...@flaminghakama.com> > To: Lilypond-User Mailing List <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Subject: Re: attachments and digest mode > Message-ID: >

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-06 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/6/16 10:05 AM, "David Wright" wrote: >On Fri 06 May 2016 at 15:08:30 (+), Carl Sorensen wrote: >> On 5/5/16 8:13 PM, "Cynthia Karl" wrote: >> >> On May 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> >> At my

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-06 Thread David Wright
On Fri 06 May 2016 at 15:08:30 (+), Carl Sorensen wrote: > On 5/5/16 8:13 PM, "Cynthia Karl" wrote: > >> On May 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > >> On 5/4/16 8:00 PM, "Cynthia Karl" wrote: > >>> > >>> In my experience, all are

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-06 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/5/16 8:13 PM, "Cynthia Karl" wrote: > >> On May 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> >> >> On 5/4/16 8:00 PM, "Cynthia Karl" wrote: >> >>> >>> In my experience, all are available through links, but never the ones >>>

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-05 Thread David Wright
On Thu 05 May 2016 at 11:26:17 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote: > > This thread is dying a quick death. I have raised this issue with the > > nonsensical digest attachments several times in the last several years. > > Those threads also died a quick death. I wonder how many get the

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-05 Thread David Wright
gt; >> To: Flaming Hakama by Elaine <ela...@flaminghakama.com> > >> Subject: Re: attachments and digest mode > >> > >> On Fri 29 Apr 2016 at 17:05:05 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote: > >> > >>> I will note, however, that the s

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-05 Thread David Wright
On Wed 04 May 2016 at 21:00:22 (-0500), Cynthia Karl wrote: > > > Message: 4 > > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:21:28 -0500 > > From: David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> > > To: Flaming Hakama by Elaine <ela...@flaminghakama.com> > > Subject: Re: attac

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-05 Thread Cynthia Karl
> On May 5, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > > On 5/4/16 8:00 PM, "Cynthia Karl" wrote: > >> >> In my experience, all are available through links, but never the ones >> given in the digest. > > Links on digest work for me, but I get them in

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-05 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/4/16 8:00 PM, "Cynthia Karl" <pck...@mac.com> wrote: > >> Message: 4 >> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:21:28 -0500 >> From: David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> >> To: Flaming Hakama by Elaine <ela...@flaminghakama.com> >> Subje

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-05-05 Thread Flaming Hakama by Elaine
> This thread is dying a quick death. I have raised this issue with the > nonsensical digest attachments several times in the last several years. > Those threads also died a quick death. I wonder how many get the Lilypond > user list via the digest rather than as individual emails. I would

Re: attachments and digest mode

2016-04-29 Thread David Wright
On Fri 29 Apr 2016 at 17:05:05 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote: > I will note, however, that the suggestions about using images or > attachments don't seem to work with the list in digest mode. > > Choosing an example from the latest digest, the attachment link yeilds a > 404 error. > >

attachments and digest mode

2016-04-29 Thread Flaming Hakama by Elaine
I certainly have my preferences about mailing list etiquette (text-only, bottom-posting, code examples inline, publish images on an external web site and include inline links to the images.) However, I realize that these are only personal preferences and should have no real effect on the