bad grace note spacing

2023-02-17 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Please have a look at this example. ``` { \omit Staff.TimeSignature \repeat unfold 16 { \grace e'8 d'4 } \break \repeat unfold 8 { \grace e'8 d'4 } } \paper { indent = 0 } ``` As can be seen, the spacing between grace notes and the corresponding main notes increases if the overall spacing

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-17 Thread Jean Abou Samra
> Le 17 févr. 2023 à 12:08, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > >  > Please have a look at this example. > > ``` > { > \omit Staff.TimeSignature > \repeat unfold 16 { \grace e'8 d'4 } \break > \repeat unfold 8 { \grace e'8 d'4 } > } > > \paper { indent = 0 } > ``` > > As can be seen, the spacing

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-17 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Try playing around with spacing parameters. As a starting point: > > \override Score.SpacingSpanner.strict-grace-spacing = ##t I tried that, but as soon as a group of grace notes has some accidentals it produces bad output. This is now https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6533

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-17 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le vendredi 17 février 2023 à 18:42 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > ``` > > > Try playing around with spacing parameters. As a starting point: > > > > \override Score.SpacingSpanner.strict-grace-spacing = ##t > > I tried that, but as soon as a group of grace notes has some > accidentals it prod

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-17 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> I tried that, but as soon as a group of grace notes has some >> accidentals it produces bad output. > > Doesn't that sound more like the issue should be > "strict-grace-spacing produces bad output if grace note has > accidental" rather than "strict-grace-spacing should be the > default"? The

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-17 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> I tried that, but as soon as a group of grace notes has some >>> accidentals it produces bad output. >> >> Doesn't that sound more like the issue should be >> "strict-grace-spacing produces bad output if grace note has >> accidental" rather than "strict-grace-spacing should be the >> default

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-17 Thread Jean Abou Samra
> Le 18 févr. 2023 à 00:10, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > > The issue I filed is not related to `strict-grace-spacing` at all. It’s quite related. In strict-grace-spacing mode, grace columns are not part of the main chain of springs that goes through the whole system from column to columns and

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> The issue I filed is not related to `strict-grace-spacing` at all. > > It’s quite related. [...] With 'related' I meant that there are two separate bugs. I didn't talk about what the best fix for the whole problem actually is. > In strict-grace-spacing mode, grace columns are not part of t

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-18 Thread Jean Abou Samra
> Le 18 févr. 2023 à 09:01, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > >  >>> The issue I filed is not related to `strict-grace-spacing` at all. >> >> It’s quite related. [...] > > With 'related' I meant that there are two separate bugs. I didn't > talk about what the best fix for the whole problem actua

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-18 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le samedi 18 février 2023 à 08:01 +, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > ``` > > >> The issue I filed is not related to `strict-grace-spacing` at all. > > > > It’s quite related.  [...] > > With 'related' I meant that there are two separate bugs.  I didn't > talk about what the best fix for the whole

Re: bad grace note spacing

2023-02-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I missed it at first, but it's actually very easy in your example. Thanks, added to #6533. Werner