Re: Beams over rests

to do >that for every affected beam, it ensures that they look good and work >properly. > >Cheers, > >A > >On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:08 AM Paul Hodges wrote: >>The composer I'm working on is very fond of having beams over rests - >>and indeed it helps a lot i

Re: Beams over rests

that they look good and work properly. Cheers, A On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:08 AM Paul Hodges wrote: > The composer I'm working on is very fond of having beams over rests - > and indeed it helps a lot in reading his more complex rhythms. However, > LilyPond is treating rests differe

Beams over rests

The composer I'm working on is very fond of having beams over rests - and indeed it helps a lot in reading his more complex rhythms. However, LilyPond is treating rests differently from notes, in that beam positions are adjusted to suit the notes, whereas rests are then adjusted to suit

Re: Beams over rests and concaveness

Hi Carl, Thank you so much for the reply, I will report this in the bugs subforum. Also, thanks for the workaround, I will use it for the moment being. Best, Gilberto -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Beams over rests and concaveness

On 1/23/20, 7:48 AM, "Gilberto Agostinho" wrote: Hi everyone, It seems that the beam concaveness value is ignored when beaming over rests, in the case of a single note with a single rest. This happens with and without stemlet. See the code and score below, the groups

Beams over rests and concaveness

Hi everyone, It seems that the beam concaveness value is ignored when beaming over rests, in the case of a single note with a single rest. This happens with and without stemlet. See the code and score below, the groups marked with an asterisk should have been flat (+inf.0 concaveness): \version

Beams over rests and concaveness

Hi everyone, It seems that the beam concaveness value is ignored when beaming over rests, in the case of a single note with a single rest. This happens with and without stemlet. See the code and score below, the groups marked with an asterisk should have been flat (+inf.0 concaveness): \version

Re: automatic beams over rests?

Tobin Chodos writes: > Is there no way to set beams to go over rests globally? Not with reasonable amount of effort (you'd need to write a replacement for the Auto_beam_engraver: the built-in one doesn't beam over rests). -- David Kastrup

automatic beams over rests?

Is there no way to set beams to go over rests globally? Thanks again - new to this list but learning a lot. Tobin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

again: beams over rests

Dear community, I have a problem with beams over rests. In the below quoted snippet, they don't look like expected. I would like to have the beams longer and the should include the last rest of the four sixteenths group, Does someone have an idea for solving this problem? \version 2.14.2 \new

Re: again: beams over rests

:51 AM Subject: again: beams over rests Dear community, I have a problem with beams over rests. In the below quoted snippet, they don't look like expected. I would like to have the beams longer and the should include the last rest of the four sixteenths group, Does someone have an idea

Re: again: beams over rests

hello, On 28 December 2011 11:51, Stefan Thomas kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote: Dear community, I have a problem with beams over rests. In the below quoted snippet, they don't look like expected. I would like to have the beams longer and the should include the last rest of the four

Re: again: beams over rests

- Original Message - From: Stefan Thomas I would like to have the beams longer and the should include the last rest of the four sixteenths group, Does someone have an idea for solving this problem? \version 2.14.2 \new Staff { \time 3/4 r16 g' c' r r f' g' r c' r f' r % no

Re: beams over rests

On 30/06/11 11:42, Edward Neeman wrote: Hello, In this example (taken from the Documentation page, http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/beams ), the beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to look like it does in the documentation? Thanks, Edward

Re: beams over rests

Hello. On 30 Jun 2011, at 06:34, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: Colin Campbell cpkc at shaw.ca writes: Consistently broken for me, with 2.12.3, 2.13.63 and 2.15.3 on Ubuntu 11.04 I made a bug-list entry http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1718 I think you meant

Re: beams over rests

Hi, for me it works as expected on 2.15.2. Strange... Am 30.06.2011 03:42, schrieb Edward Neeman: Hello, In this example (taken from the Documentation page, http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/beams ), the beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it

beams over rests

Hello, In this example (taken from the Documentation page, http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/beams ), the beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to look like it does in the documentation? Thanks, Edward

Re: beams over rests

Edward Neeman edward.neeman at gmail.com writes: beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right.  How can I get it to look like it does in the documentation? \version 2.14.1 \relative c' { r4 r8[ g' a r] r g[ | a] r } Uh oh. It works perfectly for me with 2.14.0, giving a

Re: beams over rests

Hi Keith (and Edward), Could you, or anybody else who gets the bad output, post which Lilypond version and which operating system you use? Doesn't work here… 2.15.1-1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7. Cheers, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: beams over rests

Hi, I'm using Lilypond 2.14.1 and MacOSX 10.5.8. If I set the Beam 'stemlet-length to a value greater than 0, then the beam looks like it should. Thanks, Edward On 6/30/11 9:48 AM, Keith OHara wrote: Edward Neeman edward.neeman

Re: beams over rests

On 11-06-29 08:48 PM, Keith OHara wrote: Edward Neemanedward.neemanat gmail.com writes: beam doesn't extend over the rest on the right. How can I get it to look like it does in the documentation? \version 2.14.1 \relative c' { r4 r8[ g' a r] r g[ | a] r } Uh oh. It

Re: beams over rests

Colin Campbell cpkc at shaw.ca writes: Consistently broken for me, with 2.12.3, 2.13.63 and 2.15.3 on Ubuntu 11.04 I made a bug-list entry http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1718 Edward Neeman edward.neeman at gmail.com writes: If I set the Beam 'stemlet-length to a value

beams over rests

I'm writing a piece with complex rhythms and want to beam rests together with notes for clarity. c8[ r8] produces a beam on the c which does not extend to the following rest. c8[ \set stemLeftBeamCount = #1r8] produces what I'm after in that case... but in any case manually beaming every

beams over rests

I'm writing a piece with complex rhythms and want to beam rests together with notes for clarity. c8[ r8] produces a beam on the c which does not extend to the following rest. c8[ \set stemLeftBeamCount = #1r8] produces what I'm after in that case... but in any case manually beaming every beat

automatic beams over rests

Dear lilypond-users, I have a question: is it possible, to get the beams in the below quoted example automatically? \relative { r8 [ c 8] r8 [ r16 d] r16 [ e8. ] r8 [ d] } Thanks, Stefan ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: automatic beams over rests

to stop: \relative { r 8 [ c 8 r 8 r 16 d r 16 e 8. r 8 d ] } hdh Eluze -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/automatic-beams-over-rests-tp20881793p20881959.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: automatic beams over rests

Stefan, see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-11/msg00213.html - Mark ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: automatic beams over rests

and Sibelius. Beams over rest can be very useful in rhythmic complex contermporary music and it would be great if one could switch on the beams over rests automatically. Can be done something like this with a sheme-script? 2008/12/7 Mark Polesky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stefan, see http://lists.gnu.org/archive

Re: automatic beams over rests

. I know that there is a possibilitie to do this in Finale and Sibelius. Beams over rest can be very useful in rhythmic complex contermporary music and it would be great if one could switch on the beams over rests automatically. Can be done something like this with a sheme-script? 2008/12/7

Re: automatic beams over rests

Stefan Thomas wrote: it would be great if one could switch on the beams over rests automatically. Carl D. Sorensen wrote: This would require a rewrite of the AutoBeaming code ...Maybe I can take a stab at it over the Christmas holiday. Carl, That would be awesome. - Mark