Hi,
Han-Wen noticed the new and reworked
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
which is much more factional, informational and more
beautiful. Thanks for all the work that has gone
into it!
I'm kind of hoping that the same would be done for
the German and Dutch pages -- although the G
Bravo!
My one comment is that the q=60 marking looks a little off & is different than
some commensurate markings in the docs. Otherwise, sweet!
MS
On Dec 17, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Han-Wen noticed the new and reworked
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Li
Hello,
On 17/12/2010 13:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
although the German
page has a very beautiful Stockhausen excerpt.
At what point would this contravene some copyright law?
James
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM, James wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 17/12/2010 13:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
>> although the German
>> page has a very beautiful Stockhausen excerpt.
>
> At what point would this contravene some copyright law?
Depends on the legal jurisdiction -- which, of course, i
On 2010-12-17 14:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi,
Han-Wen noticed the new and reworked
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
which is much more factional, informational and more
beautiful. Thanks for all the work that has gone
into it!
Beautiful. But really stunning is the fact th
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Kobel"
To: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
Cc: "lilypond-user"
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: beautifully reworked wiki page
On 2010-12-17 14:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi,
Han-Wen noticed t
I believe those are two different files. At first I was under the same
impression, but upon repeated jostling between the images, I see that the
treble clefs, tempo markings, and taglines are different.
Perhaps some sort of document showing the subtle differences would help?
Or are they in fac
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM, James wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 17/12/2010 13:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>>
>>> although the German
>>> page has a very beautiful Stockhausen excerpt.
>>
>> At what point would this contravene some copyright law?
>
> Depends on the le
Hello
On 17/12/2010 15:09, Graham Percival wrote:
I honestly don't know why people tempt fate like this -- I mean,
Patrick's fibonacci is beautiful! If you like the colours from the
Stockhausen except, well, those are easy to add to Patrick's piece.n
Throw in some cross-staff beams, and you're
Mike Solomon wrote Friday, December 17, 2010 3:29 PM
I believe those are two different files. At first
I was under the same impression, but upon repeated
jostling between the images, I see that the treble
clefs, tempo markings, and taglines are different.
They are different. If you blow
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:30 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> In my non-expert (I am not a lawyer) opinion, the current except on
>> the German page would contravene Canadian copyright law.
>
> It depends on whether the quote makes sense for working with/from. Not
> every
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:33 PM, James wrote:
> Well my point was with some of our duller Inspirational Headwords, I am
> always on the look out for 'interesting' LilyPond files that we could
> potentially use in the Doc.
Invent something from scratch.
> So thinking if this were something we cou
Graham Percival writes:
> If you don't like the "martians vaporized our art" thought, then
> consider letting politicians know, and consider voting for political
> parties which favour certain types of copyright reform. But if you
> thought that the road to 2.14 was a long and painful process, y
On 2010-12-17 16:20, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
Hey all,
I believe those are two different files. At first I was under the same
impression, but upon repeated jostling between the images, I see that the
treble clefs, tempo markings, and taglines are different.
Or are they in fact the same an
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Han-Wen noticed the new and reworked
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_LilyPond
>
> which is much more factional, informational and more
> beautiful. Thanks for all the work that has gone
> into it!
I've tried to help impr
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> Bravo!
> My one comment is that the q=60 marking looks a little off & is different
> than some commensurate markings in the docs. Otherwise, sweet!
I noticed this the other day, and I was prompted to open this tracker issue:
http://code.goo
16 matches
Mail list logo
