Dear Keith,
thanks very much for Your very good explanations.
I think, the best solution would be to write the dynamics in the lower
staff, as You suggested.
2011/7/25 Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:52:06 -0700, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktstefan@googlemail.**com
Dear Keith, dear Community,
I tought I could also solve problem in the below quoted snippet with and
override of minimum-Y-extent. But unfortunately, I get a bad collision
between dynamics and and the next staff:
\version 2.14.1
re = { \change Staff = right }
li = { \change Staff = left }
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:52:06 -0700, Stefan Thomas
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com wrote:
I thought I could also solve problem in the below quoted snippet with and
override of minimum-Y-extent. But unfortunately, I get a bad collision
between dynamics and and the next staff:
The crescendo to
Dear Keith,
thanks for Your explanations.
I think, the thing with the skyline-horizontal-padding should be also a
part of the documentation. At least I didn't find it there.
I would have thought so, too.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work.How can I avoid the collision in bar 2
without
Dear community,
I thought it would be possible to change the staffgroup-staff-spacing in the
middle of a piece.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work.
How can I avoid the collision in bar 2 withoud increasing the
staffgroup-staff-spacing generally?
Here is my example:
\version 2.14.1
primoA = {
Stefan Thomas kontrapunktstefan at googlemail.com writes:
I thought it would be possible to change the staffgroup-staff-spacing in
the middle of a piece.
I would have thought so, too.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work.How can I avoid the collision in bar 2
without increasing the
