Martin Tarenskeen writes:
> On Sun, 18 May 2014, Graham King wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 18 May 2014 08:38:09 +0200 (CEST) Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>> > Luckily I don't need this kind of commandline virtuosity. I
>>think I
>> > can do what I need with one of the first and easiest
>>sug
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Graham King wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2014 08:38:09 +0200 (CEST) Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> Luckily I don't need this kind of commandline virtuosity. I
think I
> can do what I need with one of the first and easiest
suggestions
>
> convert-ly -e **/*.ly
One
On Sun, 18 May 2014 08:38:09 +0200 (CEST) Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> > Luckily I don't need this kind of commandline virtuosity. I think I
> > can do what I need with one of the first and easiest suggestions
> >
> > convert-ly -e **/*.ly
>
I'm glad that you have a solution that works for you. S
Martin Tarenskeen writes:
> On Sun, 18 May 2014, Graham King wrote:
>
>> If you're going to use xargs, be careful of .ly files containing whitespace
>> in the filename. The GNU implementations of find and xargs support an
>> option for that:
>>
>> find . -name \*.ly -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 conve
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Graham King wrote:
If you're going to use xargs, be careful of .ly files containing whitespace
in the filename. The GNU implementations of find and xargs support an
option for that:
find . -name \*.ly -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 convert-ly -e
The commandline solution for t
On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 11:37 -0500, Patrick or Cynthia Karl wrote:
>
> If you are on a unix machine (Mac, PC with Ubuntu, etc) you could do that by
> issuing the following command in a terminal window:
>
> find . -name \*.ly -print | xargs -n 1 convert-ly -e
>
> There is also a (possibly
Tim McNamara writes:
> On May 17, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
>> On 17.05.2014 18:20, Tim McNamara wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 16, 2014, at 1:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
Tim McNamara writes:
> Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a directory without having
On May 17, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Malte Meyn wrote:
> On 17.05.2014 18:20, Tim McNamara wrote:
>>
>> On May 16, 2014, at 1:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Tim McNamara writes:
>>>
Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a directory without having
to cd into the directory and in
On 17.05.2014 18:20, Tim McNamara wrote:
On May 16, 2014, at 1:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Tim McNamara writes:
Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a directory without having
to cd into the directory and invoking
convert-ly -e *.ly
There doesn’t seem to be a recursive opti
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:32:28 -0500
> From: Tim McNamara
> To: LilyPond Users
> Subject: convert-ly question
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> Is there a syntax
Tim McNamara writes:
> On May 16, 2014, at 1:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Tim McNamara writes:
>>
>>> Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a directory without having
>>> to cd into the directory and invoking
>>>
>>> convert-ly -e *.ly
>>>
>>> There doesn’t seem to be a recur
On May 16, 2014, at 1:54 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Tim McNamara writes:
>
>> Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a directory without having
>> to cd into the directory and invoking
>>
>> convert-ly -e *.ly
>>
>> There doesn’t seem to be a recursive option. Since I’ve got .ly
Tim McNamara writes:
> Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a directory without having
> to cd into the directory and invoking
>
>convert-ly -e *.ly
>
> There doesn’t seem to be a recursive option. Since I’ve got .ly files
> in 158 different directories it’d be really nice to be a
Wow! Thanks, Phil!
Ralph
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Phil Burfitt wrote:
> Sorry, correction..
>
>for /F "delims=" %n in ('dir /b /s *.ly') do convert-ly -e "%n"
>
>
> Phil.
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> h
Sorry, correction..
for /F "delims=" %n in ('dir /b /s *.ly') do convert-ly -e "%n"
Phil.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Tim,
Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a directory without having to
cd into the directory and invoking
convert-ly -e *.ly
There doesn’t seem to be a recursive option. Since I’ve got .ly files in
158 different directories it’d be really nice to be able to >batch update
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Malte Meyn wrote:
Under Linux try:
find . -name '*.ly' -exec convert-ly -e '{}' \;
Or, shorter, but doesn’t work by default with all shells (for example bash
needs “shopt -s globstar” in the .bashrc):
convert-ly -e **/*.ly
Thanks for the hint, I didn't know that "sh
Under Linux try:
find . -name '*.ly' -exec convert-ly -e '{}' \;
Or, shorter, but doesn’t work by default with all shells (for example
bash needs “shopt -s globstar” in the .bashrc):
convert-ly -e **/*.ly
On 16.05.2014 20:32, Tim McNamara wrote:
Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
> Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a directory without having to
> cd into the directory and invoking
>
>convert-ly -e *.ly
>
> There doesn’t seem to be a recursive option. Since I’ve got .ly files in
> 158 different directo
Is there a syntax for running convert-ly on a directory without having to cd
into the directory and invoking
convert-ly -e *.ly
There doesn’t seem to be a recursive option. Since I’ve got .ly files in 158
different directories it’d be really nice to be able to batch update them with
so
20 matches
Mail list logo
