On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:41:41 -0700, David Nalesnik
wrote:
Thank you very much, Keith, for the explanations and the two snippets.
They cover the situations I've encountered so far. (The first when there
are no scripts present.)
I suggest using the simpler first method for all cases.
The se
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
[...]
> %% Just as an experiment, this is my best attempt
> %% to help LilyPond make the placement decisions on her own
>
> \new PianoStaff <<
> \new Staff = "up" {
> s8*7^\p^\< s8^\f }
> \new Staff = "down" {
> e'8[
> ( \up b
David Nalesnik gmail.com> writes:
> Attempting to put dynamics above cross-staff notes using the code below
leads to some awful collisions.
LilyPond postpones deciding the placement of things that cross staves,
until the staff-spacing is known. A minor variation of your example,
with the no
On Jul 25, 2014, at 6:19 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attempting to put dynamics above cross-staff notes using the code below leads
> to some awful collisions. I've recast my example in three ways, to no avail.
>
> In the first example, besides the collisions, the final stem is reverse
Hi,
Attempting to put dynamics above cross-staff notes using the code below
leads to some awful collisions. I've recast my example in three ways, to
no avail.
In the first example, besides the collisions, the final stem is reversed
and I get a number of programming errors: "Grob direction reque
Hi Thomas,
> the version with scaled duration will ofcourse affect a midi.
> If you want a proper midi use a second voice.
Thanks for the confirmation (for me, and for anyone checking these archives
someday).
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing
2013/5/30 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi Thomas,
>
>> Scaling durations will avoid a second voice:
>
> Just out of curiosity, how does that affect playback/MIDI?
>
> Since the visuals are indistinguishable in the one- and two-voice versions,
> would it be "better practice" to keep it in two voices — desp
Hi Thomas,
> Scaling durations will avoid a second voice:
Just out of curiosity, how does that affect playback/MIDI?
Since the visuals are indistinguishable in the one- and two-voice versions,
would it be "better practice" to keep it in two voices — despite the relative
code clutter — in order
Hi Harm,
> I can't explain the details, I've not the needed knowledge.
> Though, one point is that \crossStaff dosn't _initiate_ something like
> \changeStaff.
> You need to write the notes into the Staffs where you want them to be.
> \crossStaff will then connect their stems.
Actually, you appa
on 2013-05-30 at 06:38 Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> 1. It's not cross-staffing; and,
well, evidently i was not fast enough to finish the lilypond example and
post it to the list before you got a response from this great list.
anyway, the solution i came up with is below.
> 2. The eighth-note flags
2013/5/30 Thomas Morley :
> Refering to my own edition of Beethoven's Sonatas the code below seems
> to print what you want.
>
> \version "2.17.19"
> \language "english"
>
> piano_notes_upper = \relative d' {
>4 r r r8 d8 | % 16
>r8 cs r b r a r cs | % 17
> }
>
> piano_notes_lower = \r
2013/5/30 Kieren MacMillan :
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone explain why this snippet (from Beethoven Op. 10 No. 3) is failing
> in two different ways?
>
> \version "2.17.19"
> \language "english"
>
> piano_notes_upper = \relative d' {
> 4 r r \crossStaff { r8 8 } | % 16
> \crossStaff { r8 r r r
…) you have to specify
\crossStaff in the staff whose notes are to cross the staff, i.e. in your
example in the lower staff.
maybe somebody with deeper insight can give more details on how to use it!?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/cross-staff-b
Hi all,
Can anyone explain why this snippet (from Beethoven Op. 10 No. 3) is failing in
two different ways?
\version "2.17.19"
\language "english"
piano_notes_upper = \relative d' {
4 r r \crossStaff { r8 8 } | % 16
\crossStaff { r8 r r r } | % 17
}
piano_notes_lower = \relative d,
14 matches
Mail list logo
