Bertalan Fodor writes:
> Two problems:
> - what are the correct dependencies (what should be installed)? I
> installed the guile and the libguile16 package, and I had to install
> the gmp package too.
Thanks, I added that. GMP packaging is broken; 'gmp' holds
development and runtime librarie
Hello, I've tried it.
Two problems:
- what are the correct dependencies (what should be installed)? I
installed the guile and the libguile16 package, and I had to install the
gmp package too.
- when I start guile, I get a message about initialization of
application is not correct (0xc005). T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
> > What will we do with other packages (gnucash?) that expect GUILE 1.6 ?
>
> Just keep the libguile12 package around indefinately would take care
> of that. My concern is the flaky impression users may get if
> guile-1.7.x is the defaul
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> What will we do with other packages (gnucash?) that expect GUILE 1.6 ?
Just keep the libguile12 package around indefinately would take care
of that. My concern is the flaky impression users may get if
guile-1.7.x is the default package and silly bugs are found (such
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
> >> acceptable to upload 1.7.x to Cygwin
>
> > It would be prudent to rename the package to guile-snapshot
>
> So that's a no?
What will we do with other packages (gnucash?) that expect GUILE 1.6 ?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PRO
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>> acceptable to upload 1.7.x to Cygwin
> It would be prudent to rename the package to guile-snapshot
So that's a no?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Han-Wen, what is GUILE's policy on development snapshots, would it be
> acceptable to upload 1.7.x to Cygwin (I remember having seen very
> strong wording against binary distribution of guile 1.5.x).
I would suggest to ignore the policy whatever it is. Since they don
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> Jan, could you also try to build a new guile to see if it allows me
> now to build lilypond 2.3?
Yay, another round of free libtool-fun! Ok, you should be able to
point your setup.exe to
http://lilypond.org/cygwin/
and select guile-1.7.1 from the [test] release. A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Bertalan Fodor writes:
>
> > Anyway, I was able to install it, it seems to be good.
>
> Thanks. I fixed some more things, I'll announce it tomorrow.
>
> > Jan, could you also try to build a new guile to see if it allows me
> > now to build lilypond 2.3?
>
> Which ve
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> Anyway, I was able to install it, it seems to be good.
Thanks. I fixed some more things, I'll announce it tomorrow.
> Jan, could you also try to build a new guile to see if it allows me
> now to build lilypond 2.3?
Which version? I'll wait for guile-1.6.5, I guess?
J
There is some problem with setup.ini: from line 95 its contents are
duplicated.
Anyway, I was able to install it, it seems to be good.
Jan, could you also try to build a new guile to see if it allows me now
to build lilypond 2.3?
Bert
___
lilypond-use
I've built a new tetex release to address these problems:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2003-10/msg00193.html
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg00449.html
please download the new tetex from, (or add as additional url in
setup.exe to, that may just work):
h
12 matches
Mail list logo
