Hi Jonathan,
I guess stretched vertically is a bit vague; I guess what I'm seeing
is that as braces get larger, they are less thick than
a perfectly scaled version of the smaller brace
Yes, I see that, and it makes sense — so it's scaled, but not linearly.
That might be considered a bug. =)
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
I guess stretched vertically is a bit vague; I guess what I'm seeing
is that as braces get larger, they are less thick than
a perfectly scaled version of the smaller brace
Yes, I see that, and it makes sense — so it's scaled, but not linearly.
The
Hi Mats,
The problem is rather that the braces currently are scaled
linearly, i.e. by the same factor both horizontally and vertically,
whereas it probably looks better to to use different factors so
that the thickness doesn't grow as quickly as the height.
That's what I meant... thanks
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
In this case, you're the customer/reader. If you don't understand
what the bug reporter is trying to tell you, it's their fault for not
explaining it clearly enough. Maybe you're just not familiar with
Ukranian accordian notation. Maybe
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:59:39AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca writes:
Maybe you're like me, and have never
written stuff with lyrics. Yeah, those bug reports were fun to
handle... but if you just say sorry, I'm not at all familiar with
lyrics.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:51:17AM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Here's a bug I submitted about a month ago. I don't currently
see it in the bug tracker.
Apparently there's a backlog of 34 reports.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2009-09/msg00088.html
Hmm. I looked at
--- On Tue, 10/27/09, Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca wrote:
From: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: do you care about bug reports?
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2009, 7:16 PM
Hi
In the past few months, a few bug reports have gotten lost. A few
emails to the bug-lilypond list were never added to the bug
tracker, so even if a developer wanted to work on it, he wouldn't
know about the bug.
Honestly, I don't care. We have over 300 bugs, up from 60 or so a
few years ago.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
In the past few months, a few bug reports have gotten lost. A few
emails to the bug-lilypond list were never added to the bug
tracker, so even if a developer wanted to work on it, he wouldn't
know about the bug.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:19:27AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
In the past few months, a few bug reports have gotten lost. A few
emails to the bug-lilypond list were never added to the bug
tracker, so
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Hmm, ok. I remember adding a few items over the summer that
appeared to have gotten lost, but as long as you have all the
email archives, I guess that works out.
Yes, I noticed your concerns :)
Please do, if
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:54:32AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
It feels like more because you let it pile up. *as soon as* a bug
report comes in, look at it. If it takes you more than 60 seconds
to
12 matches
Mail list logo
