Am 03.01.2013 18:22, schrieb David Kastrup:
Eluze writes:
Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote
Just in case : if \version "2.16.1" you should use :
thanks, I always forget - should we make a request for a
backward-converter!?
What do we want done before releasing 2.18?
:-D
_
Eluze writes:
> Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote
>> Just in case : if \version "2.16.1" you should use :
>
> thanks, I always forget - should we make a request for a
> backward-converter!?
What do we want done before releasing 2.18?
--
David Kastrup
__
Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote
> Just in case : if \version "2.16.1" you should use :
thanks, I always forget - should we make a request for a
backward-converter!?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/doubleSlurs-in-single-staff-polyphony-tp
Just in case : if \version "2.16.1" you should use :
\override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #.005
2013/1/3 Eluze
> \relative c'' {
> \new Staff <<
> \new Voice {
> \voiceOne
> e2( f)
> }
> \new Voice {
> \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #.005
> \voiceThre
lt;
\new Voice {
\voiceOne
e2( f)
}
\new Voice {
\override NoteColumn.force-hshift = #.005
\voiceThree
b 2( c)
}
>>
}
hth
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/doubleSlurs-in-single-staff-polyphony-tp138697p
I'm trying to typeset a passage with two voices on the same staff. Both voices
use double slurs, and I need the slurs within each voice to be parallel (i.e.
both slurs in the top voice need to curve up). What would be the best way to do
this?
\version "2.16.1"
\relative c'' {
<<
{ \set do
