2009/4/1 Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
wrote:
They vary, but Firefox has a recognised certificate
which identifies the publisher as Mozilla Corporation.
The certificate was issued by Thawte Code Signing CA.
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 07:38:30AM +0200, Christ van Willegen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
wrote:
They vary, but Firefox has a recognised certificate
which identifies the publisher as Mozilla Corporation.
The certificate was issued by
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 04:51:36PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
It would be trivial, but as the md5sums would be autogenerated, so it
does not buy any protection against anything.
I wouldn't say that. It would provide notification of a botched
download (if anybody checks it), or notification
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 04:51:36PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
It would be trivial, but as the md5sums would be autogenerated, so it
does not buy any protection against anything.
I wouldn't say that. It
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:14:43AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
I wouldn't say that. It would provide notification of a botched
download (if anybody checks it), or notification of a very
sophisicated
The unknown publisher warning sounds like OP is running Vista. The
warning is due to the fact that the installer isn't authenticode
signed. Getting a suitable certificate for this is several hundred €/$
per year, and thus is not likely to happen.
___
Op dinsdag 31-03-2009 om 19:37 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Simon
Dahlbacka:
The unknown publisher warning sounds like OP is running Vista. The
warning is due to the fact that the installer isn't authenticode
signed. Getting a suitable certificate for this is several hundred €/$
per year,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:34 PM
Op dinsdag 31-03-2009 om 19:37 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Simon
Dahlbacka:
The unknown publisher warning sounds like OP is running Vista.
The
warning is due to the fact that the installer isn't authenticode
signed. Getting a
Francisco Vila wrote Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:37 PM
2009/3/31 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk:
(...)
You need a X.509 version 3 code-signing certificate to sign an
application.
See
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc962053.aspx
For a full description of the process see
2009/3/31 Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk:
(...)
You need a X.509 version 3 code-signing certificate to sign an application.
See
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc962053.aspx
For a full description of the process see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb172338.aspx
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk wrote:
They vary, but Firefox has a recognised certificate
which identifies the publisher as Mozilla Corporation.
The certificate was issued by Thawte Code Signing CA.
...and those certificates are $599. Ouch.
Christ van
Op zondag 29-03-2009 om 10:38 uur [tijdzone +], schreef dirk van der
eerden:
Hi Dirk,
[dit is een engelstalige lijst, kun je in het vervolg hier Engels
praten?]
probeer 2.12 te installeren, maar krijg waarschuwing uitgever onbekend, geen
digitale handtekening. Wordt geadviseerd niet te
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
I believe we can consider downloads from lilypond.org to be safe,
but Dirk does have a point: how does he verify [binary] downloads?
Perhaps we could add a column with md5sums of all the installers to
the download page? This
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
I believe we can consider downloads from lilypond.org to be safe,
but Dirk does have a point: how does he verify [binary] downloads?
Perhaps we could
I was able to download winMd5Sum for free from http://www.nullriver.com/.
Open the application (I have a shortcut on the desktop and just double click
the icon) and put in the path\filename for the file and the MD5Sum and go
for it.
Ralph
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Christ van Willegen
It would be trivial, but as the md5sums would be autogenerated, so it
does not buy any protection against anything.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Patrick McCarty pnor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
I believe we can consider downloads
probeer 2.12 te installeren, maar krijg waarschuwing uitgever onbekend, geen
digitale handtekening. Wordt geadviseerd niet te installeren.
Graag advies.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
17 matches
Mail list logo
