Hi Nick,
1. is easy: You could use
c^\markup {\finger {\char ##x2014 1}}
or
c^\markup {\finger \char ##x2014 \finger 1}
Thomas
> I attempted to use an em dash on some fingerings. Two problems:
>
> 1. It causes the font size of the fingering number to increase by
> about 50% 2. There is a s
> > Use
> >\relative c'' {c4^\markup{\finger{\char ##x2014 "1"}}}
> > or
> >\relative c'' {c4^\markup{\finger{\concat{\char ##x2014 "1"
> > respectively; \finger only applies to one argument.
>
> ... And anyway, I don't think the font includes the dash, so my guess
> is that it
2008/11/13 Alexander Kobel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Use
>\relative c'' {c4^\markup{\finger{\char ##x2014 "1"}}}
> or
>\relative c'' {c4^\markup{\finger{\concat{\char ##x2014 "1"
> respectively; \finger only applies to one argument.
... And anyway, I don't think the font includes
Bailey James E. wrote:
> Curious, I wonder how those dashes are produced. On a macintosh, en and
> em dashes can be easily inserted with option,- or option, shift,-. See
> the attached output. Where I tried using the en and em dashes produced
> just by normal utf-8.
Use
\relative c'' {c4^\m
Am 12.11.2008 um 21:43 schrieb Nick Payne:
I attempted to use an em dash on some fingerings. Two problems:
1. It causes the font size of the fingering number to increase by
about 50%
2. There is a space between the em and the 1
See attached png, which is the output from
\version "2.11.63"
I attempted to use an em dash on some fingerings. Two problems:
1. It causes the font size of the fingering number to increase by about 50%
2. There is a space between the em and the 1
See attached png, which is the output from
\version "2.11.63"
\relative c''
{
c-1
c^\markup {\
