>> The usage manual however (section 4.4) tells me to do this:
>>
>> lilypond -dbackend=eps \
>>-dno-gs-load-fonts \
>>-dinclude-eps-fonts \
>>--png \
>>-dresolution=1200 \
>>figure.ly
>>
>> That results in a png that is too wide. Ther
Peter Van Kranenburg writes:
> On 10/29/12 6:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> writing
>> \paper { paper-width=110\mm }
>> \score { { c4 c4 c4 c4 } }
>> and using
>> lilypond -dresolution=1200 --png
>> I get an image with 5197 pixels width, which is to a pixel exactly what
>> was demanded. So perha
On 10/29/12 6:13 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
writing
\paper { paper-width=110\mm }
\score { { c4 c4 c4 c4 } }
and using
lilypond -dresolution=1200 --png
I get an image with 5197 pixels width, which is to a pixel exactly what
was demanded. So perhaps you need to check what throws a spanner in
your w
David Kastrup writes:
> Peter Van Kranenburg writes:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have to provide a bitmapped image to a publisher:
>> 1200dpi, width: 11cm. It only contains one system.
>>
>> This implies a width of (11.0/2.54)*1200.0 = 5196 pixels.
>>
>> I followed the directions from the 'usage' man
Peter Van Kranenburg writes:
> Dear all,
>
> I have to provide a bitmapped image to a publisher:
> 1200dpi, width: 11cm. It only contains one system.
>
> This implies a width of (11.0/2.54)*1200.0 = 5196 pixels.
>
> I followed the directions from the 'usage' manual, and I put this on
> top of my
Dear all,
I have to provide a bitmapped image to a publisher:
1200dpi, width: 11cm. It only contains one system.
This implies a width of (11.0/2.54)*1200.0 = 5196 pixels.
I followed the directions from the 'usage' manual, and I put this on top
of my source file.
\paper{
indent=0\mm
line-
