On 17 July 2010 09:13, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense if articulations were siphoned off a
multimeasure and tacked back on by the multimeasure engraver?
They already are. The syntax constructor for full-bar rests converts
markup text and articulations into
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:05:48 -0400
From: James Lowe james.l...@datacore.com
Subject: RE: fermata not shown at playing parts
To: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org, lilypond-user@gnu.org
Message-ID: ee5ed9503d57144e895fa3d7533e9fd3ea2...@mail2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:10:35PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 7/16/10 9:49 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
The docs already say to use \fermata !
But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an example
that describes using fermata as an
Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, July 17, 2010 6:10 AM
But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an
example
that describes using fermata as an articulation. (There is an
index entry
for \fermata, however).
OK, I've added a para to Articulations and ornaments in
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, July 17, 2010 6:10 AM
But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an
example
that describes using fermata as an articulation. (There is an index
entry
for \fermata, however).
OK, I've added a
.
Playing 52 bars rest Largo is tough going I can tell you!
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of David
Kastrup
Sent: Sat 7/17/2010 9:13
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: fermata not shown at playing parts
Trevor Daniels
: fermata not shown at playing parts
Trevor Danielst.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, July 17, 2010 6:10 AM
But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an
example
that describes using fermata as an articulation. (There is an index
entry
David Kastrup wrote Saturday, July 17, 2010 9:13 AM
Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk writes:
OK, I've added a para to Articulations and ornaments in
Expressive
marks:
Articulations can be attached to rests as well as notes but they
cannot be attached to multi-measure rests. A special
Hello,
I encount a serious problem. My teacher found that my fermatas are only on
the silent parts. When I gave him the following snippet, the problem persisted.
Is it a bug? Must I use \fermata instead of ^\fermataMarkup?
Regards
Haipeng
\version 2.13.24
\layout {
\context {
\StaffGroup
Am Freitag, 16. Juli 2010, 14:47:42 schrieb 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng:
My teacher found that my fermatas are only
on the silent parts. Must I use \fermata instead of ^\fermataMarkup?
Yes, as a rule, on normal notes and rests always use \fermata, only on full-
measure rests (written as R1 etc.) use
Then you should add this to the doc in case of confusion to other people.
Regards
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The docs already say to use \fermata !
- Graham
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:18:56PM +0800, 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng wrote:
Then you should add this to the doc in case of confusion to other people.
Regards
Haipeng
On 7/16/10 9:49 AM, Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
The docs already say to use \fermata !
But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an example
that describes using fermata as an articulation. (There is an index entry
for \fermata, however).
And in
Carl,
Yes, I found these sections. The two have confused me for over two years.
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
14 matches
Mail list logo
