Re: fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread Michel Villeneuve
I understood. By searching "lilypond fingering" in Google I found the 2.9 doc page about fingering. The 2.12 doc page on this subject is enough detailed for me (beginner point of view who managed this evening to put fingering indications in the right place). Thank you very much for you help. --

Re: fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread Trevor Daniels
Nick Payne wrote Wednesday, August 12, 2009 9:59 PM Yes, the <> construct around the note is needed. If you just have e-4 e^4 e_4, all three fingerings will appear above the notes. You need . ^ and _ also work with articulations and slurs and ties. It's briefly mentioned in s.2.2.3 of th

Re: fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread Graham Percival
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 06:59:01AM +1000, Nick Payne wrote: > Yes, the <> construct around the note is needed. If you just have e-4 e^4 e_4, > all three fingerings will appear above the notes. Really? That's odd, apparently 2.13.2 is broken. { c'4^3 c_2 } gives me a 2 below the staff. Cheers,

Re: fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread Graham Percival
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:09:59PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > > Is the use of _ and ^ with fingerings documented anywhere? I don't remember > seeing this. It's certainly easier than using the chord angle brackets. " Fingering instructions may be manually placed above or below the staff, see D

RE: fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread Nick Payne
Yes, the <> construct around the note is needed. If you just have e-4 e^4 e_4, all three fingerings will appear above the notes. You need . ^ and _ also work with articulations and slurs and ties. It's briefly mentioned in s.2.2.3 of the LM as working for articulations and fingerings. Ni

Re: fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Mark Knoop wrote: > >> At 18:50 on 12 Aug 2009, michel.villene...@gmail.com wrote: >> > I don't understand why the fingering indications are up and not >> > "down" because I specified it by : \set finger

Re: fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Mark Knoop wrote: > At 18:50 on 12 Aug 2009, michel.villene...@gmail.com wrote: > > I don't understand why the fingering indications are up and not > > "down" because I specified it by : \set fingeringOrientations = > > #'(down) Sorry if it's a stupid question bu

Re: fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread Jonathan Kulp
For fingering orientation to take effect, you have to put the note inside a chord construct <>. I thought we had added a warning about this. Here's what it should look like: \set fingeringOrientations = #'(down) 4 Ok I've just added this warning about the chord construct requirement to the

Re: fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread Mark Knoop
At 18:50 on 12 Aug 2009, michel.villene...@gmail.com wrote: > I don't understand why the fingering indications are up and not > "down" because I specified it by : \set fingeringOrientations = > #'(down) Sorry if it's a stupid question but I can't see where is my > mistake. \set fingeringOrientatio

fingering orientation problem

2009-08-12 Thread michel . villeneuve
fingering down.ly Description: Binary data ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user